BEE-L Archives

Informed Discussion of Beekeeping Issues and Bee Biology

BEE-L@COMMUNITY.LSOFT.COM

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Christina Wahl <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Informed Discussion of Beekeeping Issues and Bee Biology <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Sun, 3 Nov 2013 16:06:30 +0000
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (13 lines)
"As already pointed out by others (I'm catching up on mail), not even the chemists at Bayer or Syngenta would ever make the claim that any insecticide causes "no harm" to bees at any dose, no matter how small."

Does this mean that when I find papers that claim there is "no harm at field relevant doses" what they are really saying is that there is harm, but it is at some "acceptable level" that they don't define?  Is that the point you are making?

The data will speak for itself.   We can do this plotting and color the points according to the discussions in each of the papers...whether the authors say "no harm" or "harm".  The percent survival relative to controls will fall out on the charts and we can judge for ourselves what that means.

Christina

             ***********************************************
The BEE-L mailing list is powered by L-Soft's renowned
LISTSERV(R) list management software.  For more information, go to:
http://www.lsoft.com/LISTSERV-powered.html

ATOM RSS1 RSS2