BEE-L Archives

Informed Discussion of Beekeeping Issues and Bee Biology

BEE-L@COMMUNITY.LSOFT.COM

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Stellio Matson <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Informed Discussion of Beekeeping Issues and Bee Biology <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Wed, 17 Jul 2013 23:38:24 -0700
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (28 lines)
Peter Edwards wrote:

>  Classic example of weasel words: "reducing impacts on beneficial insects"
>  Not "no impact" - just "reducing impact" by an unspecified amount!
> 1%?  2%?  
 
The door swings open both ways...pollinator advocates also commonly
fail to specify amounts in numerical terms when describing the impacts
of neonics on bee health.

Example:  On page 30 of it's current issue of WINGS 
http://www.xerces.org/wp-content/uploads/2008/06/Wings_sp2013-Xerces.pdf
the Xerces Society writes:

"As part of the effort to educate law-makers and regulators at the EPA 
about the severe impacts of these chemicals, the Xerces Society 
partnered with the American Bird Conservancy..."

"severe impacts" means what?

Paul Cherubini
El Dorado, Calif.

             ***********************************************
The BEE-L mailing list is powered by L-Soft's renowned
LISTSERV(R) list management software.  For more information, go to:
http://www.lsoft.com/LISTSERV-powered.html

ATOM RSS1 RSS2