BEE-L Archives

Informed Discussion of Beekeeping Issues and Bee Biology

BEE-L@COMMUNITY.LSOFT.COM

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Ghislain De Roeck <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Informed Discussion of Beekeeping Issues and Bee Biology <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Tue, 2 Jul 2013 08:45:20 +0200
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (20 lines)
> Yeah, and on what do you base this rash statement?

On personal experience, Peter, with many beekeepers, from comments and analyzes in the European beekeeper magazines and analyses from consumer organizations and the Belgian authorities. As I said and we all know, there are bad exceptions.

> From February 2002 until February 2011 there have been 238 notifications issued for specific veterinary drug residues in honey.

So 238 / 9 = 2,6 cases / year. Out from how many controls?

The lack of drugs is obviously a problem and then some go and look, but this is no reason to generalize, in my opinion.

Kind regards,

Ghislain De Roeck,
Belgium.

             ***********************************************
The BEE-L mailing list is powered by L-Soft's renowned
LISTSERV(R) list management software.  For more information, go to:
http://www.lsoft.com/LISTSERV-powered.html

ATOM RSS1 RSS2