BEE-L Archives

Informed Discussion of Beekeeping Issues and Bee Biology

BEE-L@COMMUNITY.LSOFT.COM

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Christina Wahl <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Informed Discussion of Beekeeping Issues and Bee Biology <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Wed, 28 Oct 2015 10:46:08 +0000
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (14 lines)
"What I was saying was that since IMI clearly accumulated, it would certainly be of interest, since as you pointed out that bees continue to feed on tainted nectar, to know to what degree the accumulation would go."

I agree.

This is the polite thread, Stan said.  And it resembles what we academics call a "journal club".  My comments would not be considered offensive there.  It happens all the time in journal discussions...."unfortunately, they didn't do x, or y, or z".  But then we have to remember:  What are they trying to show?  Beyond that, they don't need to have more evidence.

Christina


             ***********************************************
The BEE-L mailing list is powered by L-Soft's renowned
LISTSERV(R) list management software.  For more information, go to:
http://www.lsoft.com/LISTSERV-powered.html

ATOM RSS1 RSS2