BEE-L Archives

Informed Discussion of Beekeeping Issues and Bee Biology

BEE-L@COMMUNITY.LSOFT.COM

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
randy oliver <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Informed Discussion of Beekeeping Issues and Bee Biology <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Sat, 25 Jan 2014 06:02:23 -0800
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (29 lines)
> is there a path to demonstrating and determining known anti-varroa traits
that is reproducible for other beekeepers in developing a standard? What
would be the parameters for determining this trait?

The gold standard is to compare the MPG (mite population growth) relative
to controls.
See Dr Tom Rinderer's review at
http://www.apidologie.org/articles/apido/ref/first/m09127/m09127.html

Ideally, one starts identical colonies from a pooled, homogenized cage of
mite-infested bees, wait until the adult populations have been replaced by
offspring of the queens to be tested, measure the level of mite infestation
via alcohol wash, and then track that infestation rate over time.

The above method does not limit the bees to any single mechanism.  It is,
rather, a "rubber hitting the road" test to see what happens in real life.
I strongly support beekeepers using this practical method instead of trying
to breed for any specific human-chosen resistance trait.

-- 
Randy Oliver
Grass Valley, CA
www.ScientificBeekeeping.com

             ***********************************************
The BEE-L mailing list is powered by L-Soft's renowned
LISTSERV(R) list management software.  For more information, go to:
http://www.lsoft.com/LISTSERV-powered.html

ATOM RSS1 RSS2