BEE-L Archives

Informed Discussion of Beekeeping Issues and Bee Biology

BEE-L@COMMUNITY.LSOFT.COM

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Cottonwood Creek Apiaries <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Informed Discussion of Beekeeping Issues and Bee Biology <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Sat, 26 Nov 2016 08:12:37 -0700
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (46 lines)
There appears to be a certain logical fallacy in the discussion on the 
value of breeding as a partial, temporary or long term solution to 
varroa.  Credentials carry some weight in credibility and some 
credentials are admirable and formidable.  But associating credentials 
such as time in beekeeping, scale of operations run, scientific or 
academic stature or combinations of credentials with a failure to 
produce or apply genetically based resistance to varroa seems like a 
stretch.  Success in a career path combined with a failed effort or 
experiment having to do with breeding for varroa resistance says very 
little about the association between the two.  The statement that a 
credentialed person has tried breeding or its application and failed, 
tends to carry the corollary that a positive application is not 
generalizable or applicable in other circumstances.

Perhaps a more productive, and logically compelling approach is to 
analyze in detail the approaches and outcomes of various 
breeding attempts, failed or successful.  This would allow a more 
objective assessment of what may be essential (common to all putative 
success stories), necessary, or needs to be avoided (common to all 
failures).

Trying to temper with perhaps a bit of subjective optimism what appears 
to be fairly pessimistic and negative views from academics and 
beekeepers.  Subjectivity creeps into every venture, even the most pure 
academic and scientific endeavors.  Some of us who are more optimistic 
have seen colonies of defined lineages (with marked queens of the 
original lineage and matings) decrease their mite levels through a 
beekeeping year, while neighboring colonies, in the same apiary, 
rapidly increase in mite levels and many die within the beekeeping 
year.  Yes, in "research" apiaries, but a good number of times, years, 
and in different locales.

Not ignoring the realities of the complex breeding system of bees, the 
economics and scale of current beekeeping, and the relatively small R&D 
budgets and paybacks, but there has to be a better smarter way. 

Cottonwood Creek Apiaries
P. O. Box 1032
Crestone, CO 81131
719 256 4010

             ***********************************************
The BEE-L mailing list is powered by L-Soft's renowned
LISTSERV(R) list management software.  For more information, go to:
http://www.lsoft.com/LISTSERV-powered.html

ATOM RSS1 RSS2