BEE-L Archives

Informed Discussion of Beekeeping Issues and Bee Biology

BEE-L@COMMUNITY.LSOFT.COM

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Reply To:
Informed Discussion of Beekeeping Issues and Bee Biology <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Wed, 31 Jul 2013 09:03:41 -0400
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (26 lines)
I would not be so quick to blame the fact that the queens were Russian.

> The acceptance of any queens is going to be poor if the bees have already
> started queen cells, which seems to have been the case.
>

Problem is that the Russian queen was also introduced to the queen-less
colony along with two frames of brood and larva, so there was no issue with
started queen cells. There were none.

Both colonies gave every appearance of rejecting the queens and starting
their own. Add that I have never had a problem with rejected queens before.
Based on all that has been said about difficulties introducing Russians,
what happened seems to be the logical assumption.

Add that my normal method of splitting colonies is walkaway splits, and
they followed that process exactly, especially as far as timing.

Bill Truesdell
Bath, Maine

             ***********************************************
The BEE-L mailing list is powered by L-Soft's renowned
LISTSERV(R) list management software.  For more information, go to:
http://www.lsoft.com/LISTSERV-powered.html

ATOM RSS1 RSS2