BEE-L Archives

Informed Discussion of Beekeeping Issues and Bee Biology

BEE-L@COMMUNITY.LSOFT.COM

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
randy oliver <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Informed Discussion of Beekeeping Issues and Bee Biology <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Thu, 19 Nov 2009 13:32:48 -0800
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (33 lines)
>
> >Agree, but, feeding when the counts are high is the worst thing we could
> do,
> since we will be feeding the parasite and not the bees.
>
I'll need to see some supportive data for that statement, Juanse.  Those in
the US who are doing heavy feeding appear to have less nosema problems.  I'd
be curious to see some actual data.  I assume that you are speaking
figuratively about feeding the parasite, as nosema appears to be an obligate
parasite of gut cells, not pollen supplement.

>
> >Fumagilin is effective at 90%, and spores multiply in 3 days, so it is
> wise
> to give fumagilin when spores counts are under 0.5 M at the entrance (with
> Caldwell/Fries method). If bigger than that one need to repeat the
> treatment.
>
This must depend upon the area, since many of my yards, and those of others,
rarely get below that level, and thrive.  Eischen's hard data indicate that
feeding fumagillin at that low level may actually be more harmful to the
bees than not feeding, as long as they have protein.

Randy Oliver

             ***********************************************
The BEE-L mailing list is powered by L-Soft's renowned
LISTSERV(R) list management software.  For more information, go to:
http://www.lsoft.com/LISTSERV-powered.html

Access BEE-L directly at:
http://community.lsoft.com/scripts/wa-LSOFTDONATIONS.exe?A0=BEE-L

ATOM RSS1 RSS2