BEE-L Archives

Informed Discussion of Beekeeping Issues and Bee Biology

BEE-L@COMMUNITY.LSOFT.COM

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Christina Wahl <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Informed Discussion of Beekeeping Issues and Bee Biology <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Sun, 2 Jun 2013 06:01:02 -0400
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (13 lines)
Randy,

Andrew Wakefield and company are/were scientists (and doctors) but in this case they weren't "working".  The paper was fraudulent and proven so.  They didn't actually do a rigorous study to back up their claims.  They didn't properly conduct an experiment.  They manipulated their information to make it look compelling.

So...where was the work?  They were cheating and they were discredited as a result.

Christina

             ***********************************************
The BEE-L mailing list is powered by L-Soft's renowned
LISTSERV(R) list management software.  For more information, go to:
http://www.lsoft.com/LISTSERV-powered.html

ATOM RSS1 RSS2