BEE-L Archives

Informed Discussion of Beekeeping Issues and Bee Biology

BEE-L@COMMUNITY.LSOFT.COM

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Sender:
Informed Discussion of Beekeeping Issues and Bee Biology <[log in to unmask]>
Subject:
From:
Aaron Morris <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Wed, 2 Feb 2000 10:38:11 -0500
Content-Type:
text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
MIME-Version:
1.0
Reply-To:
Informed Discussion of Beekeeping Issues and Bee Biology <[log in to unmask]>
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (22 lines)
James Bach wrote:
...

> 10.  Matthew's statement that 80-100 percent of the colonies would die if
> he didn't use mite treatments proves the susceptibility of the bees to
> mites....

I wonder about this.  Are the captured swarms kept in isolation, or are they
moved into a bee yard with other hives?  If the later, it could possibly be
the proximity to other hives that are tipping the scales towards varroa
infestation.  Feral hives I have known are usually isolated enough that
drifting is not a parameter in spreading mites, or at least not as great a
parameter as drifting would be in a beeyard with other hives in much closer
quarters.  It could be that moving a captured feral hive into closer
proximity to other colonies increases the infestation pressure.  It might
not be the susceptibility of feral hives per se, but rather an increased
pressure put upon ANY hives in higher colony population densities.

Comments anyone?

Aaron Morris - I think, therefore I bee!

ATOM RSS1 RSS2