Subject: | |
From: | |
Reply To: | |
Date: | Thu, 26 Oct 1995 15:03:24 -0500 |
Content-Type: | text/plain |
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
Hey Jim,
Sorry for the belatedness of this response. Not really positive of
my chemistry in the medicine Sulfa, but I do believe it is a derivitive
of the basic compound sulfer. Will check when I get the time and get
back with you on that. You got my curiosity up. That's my big downfall,
I have too big a curiosity, don't have time to follow up a lot of the
things I'm interested in. Take care and hoep you have a good day. MIKE
Mike Stoops
Sugar Land, Texas
On Tue, 26 Sep 1995, Jim Osborn wrote:
> Michael Stoops <[log in to unmask]> writes:
> >In reference to the discovery of minute amounts of sulfer in the honey.
> >Hope those people don't eat eggs...
> >
> >On Fri, 15 Sep 1995, Allen Dick wrote:
> >> We lost the best treatment for AFB years back...
> >>
> >> Sulfa was an excellent control because of its persistence.
>
> Michael is confusing sulfa the drug with sulphur the compound.
> They're not the same.
>
> [log in to unmask]
>
|
|
|