BEE-L Archives

Informed Discussion of Beekeeping Issues and Bee Biology

BEE-L@COMMUNITY.LSOFT.COM

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
randy oliver <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Informed Discussion of Beekeeping Issues and Bee Biology <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Mon, 23 Apr 2018 18:25:52 -0700
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (30 lines)
Sorry Mike,

When a study measures a independent variable, such as number of bees
returning with pollen loads, against a putative dependent variable, such as
amount of wax produced, a scatterplot graph will suggest a correlation if
the data points roughly line up along a slope.  The R squared value
indicates what percentage of the variation in the dependent variable
appears to correlate with the independent variable.

In English, an R squared value of 1 indicates 100% correlation.  In the
study we are referring to, the R squared value was 0.77, which would be
considered to be indicative of a strong correlation between incoming pollen
and wax production.  The question then is whether the pollen income was
causal--meaning, was the amount of wax produced actually due to the pollen
coming in, or was it a spurious correlation, since the amount of incoming
pollen may simply indicate that a lot of nectar was also being brought it?

I'd welcome anyone else to take a stab at explaining R squared values : )


-- 
Randy Oliver
Grass Valley, CA
www.ScientificBeekeeping.com

             ***********************************************
The BEE-L mailing list is powered by L-Soft's renowned
LISTSERV(R) list management software.  For more information, go to:
http://www.lsoft.com/LISTSERV-powered.html

ATOM RSS1 RSS2