BEE-L Archives

Informed Discussion of Beekeeping Issues and Bee Biology

BEE-L@COMMUNITY.LSOFT.COM

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Peter Borst <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Informed Discussion of Beekeeping Issues and Bee Biology <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Thu, 12 Oct 2017 09:52:20 -0400
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (15 lines)
> The taxonomy of the honey bees, genus Apis Linnaeus has been confused for 100 years. At the extremes, Maa (1953) recognized 24 species and four subgenera, whereas Buttel-Reepen (1906) argued for a single genus and just three species. In a heroic effort, Engel (1999) reviewed the vast literature (there are over 175 names) and settled on three extant subgenera and seven species. In their review of the biology of the Asian honey bees, Oldroyd & Wongsiri (2006) adopted Engel’s classification, but followed Otis (1996), who recognized two additional species.

Lo, Nathan, et al. "A molecular phylogeny of the genus Apis suggests that the Giant Honey Bee of the Philippines, A. breviligula Maa, and the Plains Honey Bee of southern India, A. indica Fabricius, are valid species." Systematic Entomology 35.2 (2010): 226-233.

see also

Otis, Gard W. "Distributions of recently recognized species of honey bees (Hymenoptera: Apidae; Apis) in Asia." Journal of the Kansas Entomological Society (1996): 311-333.

PLB

             ***********************************************
The BEE-L mailing list is powered by L-Soft's renowned
LISTSERV(R) list management software.  For more information, go to:
http://www.lsoft.com/LISTSERV-powered.html

ATOM RSS1 RSS2