BEE-L Archives

Informed Discussion of Beekeeping Issues and Bee Biology

BEE-L@COMMUNITY.LSOFT.COM
Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Sender:
Informed Discussion of Beekeeping Issues and Bee Biology <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Sun, 27 Nov 2016 16:37:16 -0800
Reply-To:
Informed Discussion of Beekeeping Issues and Bee Biology <[log in to unmask]>
Subject:
Re: Charles and Flumethrin
MIME-Version:
1.0
Message-ID:
<[log in to unmask]>
In-Reply-To:
<020301d24750$a2c45fa0$e84d1ee0$@com>
Content-Type:
text/plain; charset=UTF-8
From:
randy oliver <[log in to unmask]>
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (23 lines) 
> lets just say the driving forces looking out for beekeepers here in the
US may be a bit lacking,  just ponder the upcoming ban in Tylan.

I for one fully support better control of Tylan (there is no ban).  Tylan,
ever since its labeling for bees, has been misapplied in violation of the
label.

  I must assume that you did not attend the research lunch at CSBA where a
major honey packer showed the residues of miticides and antibiotics in U.S.
honey, compared to those of other countries.  U.S. beekeepers have no
reason to claim that their honey is the most pure.


-- 
Randy Oliver
Grass Valley, CA
www.ScientificBeekeeping.com

             ***********************************************
The BEE-L mailing list is powered by L-Soft's renowned
LISTSERV(R) list management software.  For more information, go to:
http://www.lsoft.com/LISTSERV-powered.html

ATOM RSS1 RSS2