BEE-L Archives

Informed Discussion of Beekeeping Issues and Bee Biology

BEE-L@COMMUNITY.LSOFT.COM

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Cam Bishop <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Informed Discussion of Beekeeping Issues and Bee Biology <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Sun, 24 Apr 2016 13:34:11 -0400
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (16 lines)
"The  close similarity  of the  results  of  the  CO2 and N2 treatments  indicates  that  the
effects  are  produced  by the  same  mechanism  in  both  cases. The  factor  common  to
both treatments  is that they deprive the  bee  of oxygen; the  effects may therefore be
ascribed  to  oxygen  lack.  They  are  not  produced  by CHCI3, which  acts  upon  the
nervous  system. Dr Wigglesworth,  in  conversation,  has  suggested  the  possibility
that oxygen lack prevents the oxidation  of acid metabolites produced by the activity
of the  bee, and that temporary  high accumulation  of these metabolites  gives rise in
some  way  to  permanent  effects."

My experience with N2 is different. I've used it in the introduction of virgins several times. In those cases I saw bees bringing in pollen the same afternoon that they were smoked with N2. Can't speak to CO@ because I've never used it. 

             ***********************************************
The BEE-L mailing list is powered by L-Soft's renowned
LISTSERV(R) list management software.  For more information, go to:
http://www.lsoft.com/LISTSERV-powered.html

ATOM RSS1 RSS2