BEE-L Archives

Informed Discussion of Beekeeping Issues and Bee Biology

BEE-L@COMMUNITY.LSOFT.COM

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Sender:
Informed Discussion of Beekeeping Issues and Bee Biology <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Tue, 18 Oct 2016 12:58:57 -0400
Reply-To:
Informed Discussion of Beekeeping Issues and Bee Biology <[log in to unmask]>
Message-ID:
Subject:
MIME-Version:
1.0 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding:
7bit
In-Reply-To:
Content-Type:
text/plain; charset=UTF-8
From:
Scott Koppa <[log in to unmask]>
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (19 lines)
"Disease resistance, honey production, pretty coloration; gains have been made here. But they evaporate quickly when the selective pressure is removed."


So the apparent takeaway from this and the "Contradictory conclusions" thread is that any breeding program does need to have a fairly sequestered mating area, wherein the drones/patrilines can be more tightly controlled. If not on the level of Dartmoor, then at the very least with the kind of regional "drone flooding" that Randy described.


For smaller operations or individuals, it would seem, then, that attempting to maintain desirable characteristics through splits or grafting is a fool's errand. Unless of course you artifically inseminate the resulting queens from desired drones. Or am I missing something?


S


Skillman, NJ

             ***********************************************
The BEE-L mailing list is powered by L-Soft's renowned
LISTSERV(R) list management software.  For more information, go to:
http://www.lsoft.com/LISTSERV-powered.html

ATOM RSS1 RSS2