BEE-L Archives

Informed Discussion of Beekeeping Issues and Bee Biology

BEE-L@COMMUNITY.LSOFT.COM
Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Sender:
Informed Discussion of Beekeeping Issues and Bee Biology <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Tue, 10 Dec 2013 02:24:09 -0200
Reply-To:
Informed Discussion of Beekeeping Issues and Bee Biology <[log in to unmask]>
Subject:
Re: Honey: constituent or ingredient?
MIME-Version:
1.0
Message-ID:
<[log in to unmask]>
In-Reply-To:
<[log in to unmask]>
Content-Type:
text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
From:
Juanse Barros <[log in to unmask]>
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (18 lines) 
On Mon, Dec 9, 2013 at 10:54 PM, James Fischer
>
> So, when one of the editors of the book "Emerging and Endemic Pathogens:
> Advances in Surveillance, Detection and Identification (NATO Science for
> Peace and Security Series A: Chemistry and Biology)" says that it "MAY be
> possible", that means that it is highly likely that it will prove to be
> impossible at any price.
>
> A catch 22 situation. That is the problem when you force a situation by
the judiciary system. No methodology to test what the demanding people
want. No other solution than to change the Directive to state that pollen
is part of honey.

             ***********************************************
The BEE-L mailing list is powered by L-Soft's renowned
LISTSERV(R) list management software.  For more information, go to:
http://www.lsoft.com/LISTSERV-powered.html

ATOM RSS1 RSS2