I am not up on the thing that you all are arguing about but have you given consideration to using Rife devices as a better alternative ?

I am lots of my friends use them for all sorts of different issues.

Alan

On 2013-10-12, at 18:36 PM, Peter L Borst wrote:

> Antibiotics that are crucial in human medicine should not be used in livestock.
> So, (and I ask as a layman), is it OK to use antibiotics that are not (yet perhaps?) crucial in human medicine?

Actually, that is the thinking in the US. Tylosin was developed as an alternative to oxytetracycline, when AFB started to exhibit resistance to it. It seemed wise at that point that if a new drug was going to be used against AFB, it should be one that isn't widely used in human medicine. On the other hand, chloramphenicol is prohibited because it is no longer approved for human use, and should not be used in food production. In plain language, we should have three categories. Human use only, animal use only, not to be used at all. 

             ***********************************************
The BEE-L mailing list is powered by L-Soft's renowned
LISTSERV(R) list management software.  For more information, go to:
http://www.lsoft.com/LISTSERV-powered.html