BEE-L Archives

Informed Discussion of Beekeeping Issues and Bee Biology

BEE-L@COMMUNITY.LSOFT.COM
Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
Re: Suchail paper homework assigned to Christina by Randy
From:
Mike S <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Informed Discussion of Beekeeping Issues and Bee Biology <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Fri, 21 Jun 2013 13:16:27 -0700
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (11 lines) 
>>>>    if 96% of the parent compound and metabolites are broken down to CO2 in 72 hours, how can you maintain that the binding is "irreversible"?

What happened to the remaining 4%?   Is that all it would take to overwhelm the spots where binding takes place?  Would that bee all that's necessary to make the stipulation that the binding is irreversible plausible?   I don't know.  The questions just popped into my mind as I read the post.

Mike in LA

             ***********************************************
The BEE-L mailing list is powered by L-Soft's renowned
LISTSERV(R) list management software.  For more information, go to:
http://www.lsoft.com/LISTSERV-powered.html

ATOM RSS1 RSS2