BEE-L Archives

Informed Discussion of Beekeeping Issues and Bee Biology

BEE-L@COMMUNITY.LSOFT.COM

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Bob Harrison <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Informed Discussion of Beekeeping Issues and Bee Biology <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Sat, 19 May 2007 23:24:43 -0500
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (32 lines)
Hello All,
Interesting new research published last year in Apidologie seems to support
what Dee Lusby has been saying as far as cell size being enlarged since the
late 1800's.
The research was done in Ireland on A.m.m. by J.B. McMullen & M.J.F. Brown.
"The Influence of Small Cell brood combs on the morphometry of honey bees
( Apis mellifera)
Apidologie, 37-665-672
The study gives exact places of bee size reduction and the amount of the
reduction. Bee size was measured at 5 months and then 24 months after
placement on 4.9-5.0mm. small cell comb.
The study was done only to see if cell size produced small bees and said
nothing about things like varroa control other than there were reports of
varroa control by those using small cell comb. The authors opinion was that
small cell could help with varroa control.
The authors clearly state that A.m.m was originally on 5.0mm. cell in the
late 1800's in England & Ireland. Then in the 1920's foundation of 5.5mm.
was introduced.

bob


-- 
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
believed to be clean.

******************************************************
* Full guidelines for BEE-L posting are at:          *
* http://www.honeybeeworld.com/bee-l/guidelines.htm  *
******************************************************

ATOM RSS1 RSS2