BEE-L Archives

Informed Discussion of Beekeeping Issues and Bee Biology

BEE-L@COMMUNITY.LSOFT.COM

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Sender:
Date:
Thu, 3 May 2007 09:17:24 -0600
Reply-To:
allen dick <[log in to unmask]>
Subject:
MIME-Version:
1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding:
7bit
Content-Type:
text/plain; format=flowed; charset="Windows-1252"; reply-type=original
Organization:
Deep Thought
From:
allen dick <[log in to unmask]>
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (25 lines)
>> Good genetics was the big hope, but it turns out that the mite tolerant 
>> strains do not measure -- yet -- up for many jobs, since they lack some 
>> of the qualities necessary for profitability in some important commercial 
>> applications.

> C'mon Allen, you're generalizing a bit here.  I've got mite-tolerant bees

Didn't you just tell me that you treat?  Or am I getting forgetful?

> What qualities do you feel that they are lacking?

Well, I don't personally know, but this is the buzz in commercial circles. 
These guys try every stock under the sun and decide what they like.

For example, though, the Russian stock failed to make a huge hit due to slow 
build-up for almonds, and muted response to simulative feeding.

I am just repeating what I have heard.  I am sure Bob will have more to say 
on this. 

******************************************************
* Full guidelines for BEE-L posting are at:          *
* http://www.honeybeeworld.com/bee-l/guidelines.htm  *
******************************************************

ATOM RSS1 RSS2