BEE-L Archives

Informed Discussion of Beekeeping Issues and Bee Biology

BEE-L@COMMUNITY.LSOFT.COM

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
"J. Waggle" <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Informed Discussion of Beekeeping Issues and Bee Biology <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Sat, 30 Sep 2006 11:09:42 -0400
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (23 lines)
Mike Stoops <[log in to unmask]> wrote:

>I"m no scientist, but from what I've read in this post and understand, it 
would seem that the further north (colder) one goes, the larger the worker 
bee cells become.  Did I read amiss here?

Hi Mike,

The 'remote ferals' (honeybees remote from other domestic beekeeping 
operations) I collect here in SW Pennsylvania will have worker cell sizes 
ranging somewhere between 4.9 mm and 5.0 mm OR ocasionally just above 5.0 
mm 

Cell size map:
http://www.beesource.com/pov/lusby/therm_map.htm 

Joe Waggle
EcologicalBeekeeping.com
'Bees Gone Wild Apiaries'
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FeralBeeProject

-- Visit www.honeybeeworld.com/bee-l for rules, FAQ and  other info ---

ATOM RSS1 RSS2