BEE-L Archives

Informed Discussion of Beekeeping Issues and Bee Biology

BEE-L@COMMUNITY.LSOFT.COM

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Mime-Version:
1.0
Content-Type:
text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Date:
Tue, 29 Aug 2006 14:07:27 -0400
Reply-To:
Informed Discussion of Beekeeping Issues and Bee Biology <[log in to unmask]>
Subject:
From:
Tim Arheit <[log in to unmask]>
In-Reply-To:
Content-Transfer-Encoding:
8bit
Sender:
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (15 lines)
At 12:09 PM 8/29/2006, you wrote:
>In the lean season, the hungry bees are normally fed sugar
>by beekeepers, resulting in production of poor quality
>honey. Stevia will change this practice…

A more important question,  since when could stored sugar syrup be called or sold as honey?  Of course it's poor quality honey, mainly because it's not honey.  The same would apply with Stevia or other artificially fed plant or fruit juices.  Isn't there any standard for honey?  Of course I'm sure it's being done in parts, but I've never seen anyone announce so publicly that their honey is just sugar syrup. 

The headline really ought to read:  'Government admits to producing fake honey, tries new gimmick to pass off artificial sweeter as honey.'

This should be a new one for Jim's Wall of Shame:  http://www.bee-quick.com/wall/shame2.html

-Tim

-- Visit www.honeybeeworld.com/bee-l for rules, FAQ and  other info ---

ATOM RSS1 RSS2