BEE-L Archives

Informed Discussion of Beekeeping Issues and Bee Biology

BEE-L@COMMUNITY.LSOFT.COM
Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Mime-Version:
1.0
Sender:
[log in to unmask]
Subject:
Re: queen storage
From:
Michael Palmer <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Wed, 28 Apr 2004 06:29:32 -0400
In-Reply-To:
<000b01c42cc2$d4d7b340$16bc59d8@BusyBeeAcres>
Content-Type:
multipart/mixed; x-avg-checked=avg-ok-66957104; boundary="=======3B3165D4======="
Reply-To:
Informed Discussion of Beekeeping Issues and Bee Biology <[log in to unmask]>
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (413 bytes) 
   No, not true. I only related how to set up a queen bank. I too don't
like queen banking. The "fresher" the queens, the better to introduce them.
But, a queen bank is better than my kitchen counter!

Mike


Bob said
>I guess I will be the only person to object to queen banks. I strongly
>believe a queen cage should only be a method of transporting a queen from
>the queen breeder to the beekeeper or  used in itroduction.

ATOM RSS1 RSS2