St. George is in the Folklore Dept. at Penn. I spoke to him last year about this very article; he is rather peeved that Deetz has made so much of this unpublished preliminary work & thinks it is being misinterpreted and misused by Deetz and his students. He says it was given at a conference years ago & was a very initial foray into the topic. He says it would never be published in the form in which Deetz is citing or distributing it. All of the uses of this work I have seen offer gross over-simplifications of St. George's argument, to the point that the analyses are silly at best. Bob is also peeved that not a soul who's cited the paper has communicated with him or even bothered to send him copies of articles that make prominent use of this piece. I recommend you contact St. George at Penn and communicate with him about his current thoughts on the matter. He is not best pleased that his unpublished conference paper has assumed a life of its own that he never even knew about. Best regards, M. Beaudry Archaeology Boston University