> There was NO attempt to normalize > for differing management practices. > It was a false assumption to have guessed > that "both the 'GMO' and 'conventional' > crops were treated with similar levels of > Round-Up (Glyphosate)". They were not... > So, yes, the paper does merely detect > differences in cultivation practices. Thanks for finding the full text. But wow, why do the study at all, other than to engage in GMO bashing? > That does not necessarily make the > paper a "blatant sham" Hey, I wasted everyone's time with it, so I reserve the right to call 'em as I see 'em. That wasn't even science. It wasn't even well-crafted propaganda. The burdens of a classical education demand that I cite Tolstoy (in Anna Karenina) as an authority here: "Because it was all a sham! a sham! a sham!" *********************************************** The BEE-L mailing list is powered by L-Soft's renowned LISTSERV(R) list management software. For more information, go to: http://www.lsoft.com/LISTSERV-powered.html