> Anyway, I do not want to reopen discussion on that admittedly very flawed > Harvard study. The only thing missing from the discussion was Dr. Lu. >Who does? But evidently Dr. Lu is undaunted and is taking his show on the >road: Perhaps those on BEE-L which thought the study was so flawed might attend and address their concerns on the study directly to Dr. Lu and report back. I said back in the early days of concerns over *possible* problems with the neonics I predicted a day in the future when people saying (like Bayer) *the neonics are safe around bees* popular opinion would change and their position would not be popular. To be honest only on BEE-L do I hear the Bayer position put forth so strongly. http://followthehoney.com/events/ When will the next Dr. Lu step forward? The next study? bob *********************************************** The BEE-L mailing list is powered by L-Soft's renowned LISTSERV(R) list management software. For more information, go to: http://www.lsoft.com/LISTSERV-powered.html Guidelines for posting to BEE-L can be found at: http://honeybeeworld.com/bee-l/guidelines.htm