Kevin Sutton ([log in to unmask]) wrote: >... I used to regret the major's demise, but hey, Testament is giving us >what is truly the worthwhile stuff of the old Angel catalogue. There is >no reason that they or someone like them can give us the worthy stuff from >other biggies. Let em get on with dying. It was is decrease the surplus >population. But Testament only works because someone at EMI realised that a) there wasn't a big enough market for them to reissue themselves and make money but b) a smaller company could do it. I'm sure that a more dog-in-the-manger attitude applies at other majors. I'll be convinced otherwise when one of them licenses classics from the past to a small independent. Sony? Deryk Barker [log in to unmask]