LISTSERV mailing list manager LISTSERV 16.0

Help for CLASSICAL Archives


CLASSICAL Archives

CLASSICAL Archives


CLASSICAL@COMMUNITY.LSOFT.COM


View:

Message:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Topic:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Author:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

Font:

Proportional Font

LISTSERV Archives

LISTSERV Archives

CLASSICAL Home

CLASSICAL Home

CLASSICAL  January 2009

CLASSICAL January 2009

Subject:

Beethoven by Fleisher and Szell

From:

Steve Schwartz <[log in to unmask]>

Reply-To:

Moderated Classical Music List <[log in to unmask]>

Date:

Wed, 14 Jan 2009 09:22:49 -0800

Content-Type:

text/plain

Parts/Attachments:

Parts/Attachments

text/plain (136 lines)

Ludwig van Beethoven
Piano Concerti

*  Piano Concerto #3 in c, op. 37
*  Piano Concerto #4 in G, op. 58

Leon Fleisher, piano
The Cleveland Orchestra/George Szell
Sony 82676-78767-2 Total time: 66:28

Summary for the Busy Executive: Great Third, fine Fourth.

This CD belongs to Sony's recent "Great Performances" series, and on the
whole, the project has lived up to its advertising.  Up front, I admit
I've always been a Szell fanatic. If he made a bad recording, I haven't
heard it.  I grew up with Szell and the Cleveland Orchestra.  My parents
actually took me to concerts, and when I became a teen I often went on
my own.  So the sound of Beethoven (and Mozart and Haydn) in my head is
Szell's, rather than, say, Karajan's, Furtwaengler's, or Toscanini's.
I may prefer other performances of specific pieces, but I always touch
base with Szell first.

Leon Fleisher, a favorite of Szell's, became consequently a favorite of
mine as well.  To me, he had the virtues and a good deal of the rhythmic
excitement of his teacher, Schnabel, with none of the clams.  I particularly
liked the way Fleisher delineated the architecture of a piece. He played
in such a way that you always knew where you were in the musical argument.
Particularly since his right-hand problems (these recordings predate
those), he has become a warmer, more lyrical player, although these
qualities always belonged to him.  However, one notices a new sensuality
as well.

These recordings, part of the complete set of Beethoven concertos, I
doubt have ever left the catalogue.  While I have found that I prefer
other interpretations of some of these items, if you must have all the
Beethoven piano concertos in one place, you can't really go wrong with
the set.  However, this new coupling has the advantage of newer, spiffier
sound than the box, although the box isn't bad.  I mention this because
you may get a break on the price by getting them all at once.

Beethoven wrote his third piano concerto under the influence of Mozart's
Piano Concerto #24, K. 491, in the same key of c-minor.  In general, all
of Beethoven's piano concertos owe a debt to Mozart's.  He took one type
of Mozart concerto - the so-called "military" type - and extended it in
new directions.  The Third comes from 1798 and stands closely in time
to the "Pathetique" piano sonata, also in c.  The two works share a grim,
clenched-jaw, stormy-weather vision that also permeates Beethoven's Fifth
Symphony, once again in c.  Scholars and critics tend to put the scores
of this time into a "transition" between Beethoven's first and second
periods.  On the one hand, they exhibit a conservatism in form that links
them with Haydn and Mozart.  On the other, the idiom is radically spare
and less tied to conventional classical tropes and turns of phrase.

The first movement, one of the longest in Beethoven's catalogue, follows
sonata form, but with the orchestral exposition repeated by the piano.
It works with three ideas: a rising minor triad and fall, a rhythmic
tail (TUM, ta-TUM, ta-TUM), and a lyrical idea in the major which often
turns the music toward temporary serenity.  In the beginning, Szell and
Fleisher keep the lid on the Sturm und Drang - the storm threatens rather
than breaks - because, after all, they have a hell of a long way to go
before they finish.  This actually gins up the tension, as you wait for
the blow.  Both Szell and especially Fleisher, particularly compared to
Schnabel's provocative roughhouse, emphasize the music's elegance, at
times bringing to mind the concerto's Mozartean roots.  The rhythmic
tail runs throughout the movement like Henry James's "figure in the
carpet." Szell uses the prominence of that idea to determine climaxes.
As with many of Szell's performances, there is only one major peak in
the movement - in this case, the final chord before the cadenza.  Speaking
of which, the cadenza is Beethoven's own, an essential part of the
movement's argument, rather than an excuse to take off on either some
digression or irrelevant display.  The ending, with its written-in
accelerando that doubles and redoubles the beat, usually brings down the
house, no matter how out-of-joint the performance, but I've never heard
the passage so perfectly judged in terms of crescendo as here.

The slow movement belongs to the same Beethovenian sub-genre as its
cousin in the "Pathetique" sonata - that is, a song which strives for
and achieves nobility.  Szell and Fleisher present it in such a way as
to evoke late Mozart, particularly the Masonic music in Zauberfloete.
Highlights include wind solos and duets so beautiful you may forget to
breathe, as well as Fleisher's treatment of embellishment, as if to tell
you that Chopin waits just around the corner.

In the finale, a rondo mainly of biting wit, Szell and the Cleveland
provide most of the muscle and Fleisher most of the grace, although with
Fleisher you always sense power in reserve, like the quiet hum of a
dynamo, and with Szell you can't avoid stylishness.  The "false-fugue"
entry of the rondo theme in the strings stands out.  Fleisher's crystalline
runs and subtle control of color struck me forcefully.  More than once,
under the sway of his sophisticatedly heroic lines, I longed to hear
Fleisher's version of the "Pathetique," although I have no idea whether
he even recorded it.  At any rate, the switch in tempo and mood at the
very end - a joyful, dancing triple time - seems not an afterthought,
but an inevitable outgrowth of everything that's come before.  This is
great, great Beethoven playing.

I love the Fourth Concerto the best of the five.  Indeed, I find it a
"necessary" piece. How can anybody be happy if they've never heard it?
Like Schubert's Cello Quintet in C, it seems to contain all the wisdom,
warmth, and humor I aspire to.  I require a level of musicianship and
insight for this work that I could cheerfully dispense with in, say,
Wagner's Tannhaeuser Overture or even in Beethoven's own "Emperor"
concerto.  Far and away my favorite performance is one I believe very
few would even think of: Serkin with Ormandy and the Philadelphia,
originally a Columbia LP and, as far as I know, never released as a CD,
at least in the United States.  If you see it, jump on it.

Szell and Fleisher do well, but not spectacularly well.  Indeed, both
of them sound a bit on automatic - generic Beethoven, rather than personal
Beethoven in this most personal of concertos.  Composed in 1807, it
firmly belongs to Beethoven's second period.  I associate it with the
"Waldstein" sonata of 1804, mostly because of similar thematic shapes.
Architecturally, however, the Fourth Piano Concerto is distinctive.
Music historians have made a big fuss over the opening, for solo piano.
However, the bigger deal comes from the fact that practically the entire
concerto grows out of the opening measures, before the exposition proper.
Beethoven forges myriad links among the three movements, and Ormandy and
Serkin do the best job of bringing them to light.  Furthermore, there's
real juice in Ormandy and Serkin, even if the playing is a bit rougher,
as well as a personal viewpoint toward the music.  In comparison, Szell
and Fleisher seem anonymous.  Then again, so does almost everyone else.
I've always found Arrau and Davis stodgy and Kempff and Leitner a bit
juvenile.  Schnabel and Sargent disappoint me as well - no better, no
worse than Szell and Fleisher.  This is a good interpretation, but there's
little special about it, and unfortunately I think the same of the later
Szell and Gilels Fourth.  In the absence of Ormandy and Serkin, I would
recommend Pollini and Abbado on DG, which has some life to it, but you
have to buy the complete set of five.

Steve Schwartz

             ***********************************************
The CLASSICAL mailing list is powered by L-Soft's renowned LISTSERV(R)
list management software together with L-Soft's HDMail High Deliverability
Mailer for reliable, lightning fast mail delivery.  For more information,
go to:  http://www.lsoft.com/LISTSERV-powered.html

Top of Message | Previous Page | Permalink

Advanced Options


Options

Log In

Log In

Get Password

Get Password


Search Archives

Search Archives


Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Subscribe or Unsubscribe


Archives

May 2010
April 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
December 2006
November 2006
October 2006
September 2006
August 2006
July 2006
June 2006
May 2006
April 2006
March 2006
February 2006
January 2006
December 2005
November 2005
October 2005
September 2005
August 2005
July 2005
June 2005
May 2005
April 2005
March 2005
February 2005
January 2005
December 2004
November 2004
October 2004
September 2004
August 2004
July 2004
June 2004
May 2004
April 2004
March 2004
February 2004
January 2004
December 2003
November 2003
October 2003
September 2003
August 2003
July 2003
June 2003
May 2003
April 2003
March 2003
February 2003
January 2003
December 2002
November 2002
October 2002
September 2002
August 2002
July 2002
June 2002
May 2002
April 2002
March 2002
February 2002
January 2002
December 2001
November 2001
October 2001
September 2001
August 2001
July 2001
June 2001
May 2001
April 2001
March 2001
January 2001
December 2000
November 2000
October 2000
September 2000
August 2000
July 2000
June 2000
May 2000
April 2000
March 2000
February 2000
January 2000
December 1999
November 1999
October 1999
September 1999
August 1999
July 1999
June 1999
May 1999
April 1999
March 1999
February 1999
January 1999
July 1997

ATOM RSS1 RSS2



COMMUNITY.LSOFT.COM

Secured by F-Secure Anti-Virus CataList Email List Search Powered by the LISTSERV Email List Manager