LISTSERV mailing list manager LISTSERV 16.0

Help for CLASSICAL Archives


CLASSICAL Archives

CLASSICAL Archives


CLASSICAL@COMMUNITY.LSOFT.COM


View:

Message:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Topic:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Author:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

Font:

Proportional Font

LISTSERV Archives

LISTSERV Archives

CLASSICAL Home

CLASSICAL Home

CLASSICAL  October 2008

CLASSICAL October 2008

Subject:

Pirie's Renaissance

From:

Steve Schwartz <[log in to unmask]>

Reply-To:

Moderated Classical Music List <[log in to unmask]>

Date:

Fri, 17 Oct 2008 15:40:19 -0700

Content-Type:

text/plain

Parts/Attachments:

Parts/Attachments

text/plain (104 lines)

The English Musical Renaissance: Twentieth Century British Composers &
Their Works

Peter J. Pirie
New York: St. Martin's Press. 1979.
ISBN-10: 0312254350
ISBN-13: 978-0312256353

Summary for the Busy Executive: Seminal, unfortunately.

The modern English musical renaissance - from Parry through the present
(to distinguish it from the Tudor period) - was for a long time more
experienced than studied.  People listened to it, but it didn't seem
important enough to analyze.  Elgar studies picked up during the Fifties
and Sixties.  Even so major a figure as Vaughan Williams until quite
recently had only two useful books (and probably only a pitifully few
Ph.D. theses) written about him, and the same with Britten.  Holst,
Bax, and Bridge still haven't had the kind of critical attention they
deserve.  Pirie, author of a book-length study of Frank Bridge, wrote
the first comprehensive survey of the period, and, as you can tell by
the date, that was thirty years ago.

The main good thing about this book is its breadth.  Pirie has heard a
lot.  Unfortunately, this leads to a lot of skimming.  We don't get to
spend a lot of time with any one work or composer.

Furthermore, this is a book definitely of its time from a certain
faction of the British musical fraternity which rose to prominence
during the Forties and Fifties.  Pirie fights battles long over and
relates a history long discredited.  In this view, the English musical
renaissance had promise, but fizzled, due to British insularity and
provincialism.  In Tudor times, England either led the way or remained
in the forefront of European music.  In the twentieth century, it couldn't
keep up with the advanced music on the continent.  To help prove his
point, Pirie arranges his book by year, so we can note, for example,
that the Elgar Second Symphony (1911) appeared after Schoenberg's Second
String Quartet (1908).  Vaughan Williams's Fantasia on a Theme by Thomas
Tallis (1910) comes after Bartok's First String Quartet (1908).  After
Elgar, England produced at best minor artists until, possibly, Britten
and Tippett.  To me, the viewpoint seems quaint as well as historically
inaccurate.  The major figures of the period were never as ignorant of
continental developments as the proponents of this story make out.
Finzi, of all people, chaired a symposium on Bartok.

One can agree or disagree with Pirie's evaluation of different composers.
I think, for example, that he overrates Delius and severely underrates
(and misreads) Vaughan Williams, particularly as a major Modernist.
Pirie dismisses the Vaughan Williams piano concerto as "dull." Bartok
admired it.  I agree with Bartok, and I like to think I'm in better
company.  Nevertheless, I believe the attention Pirie brings to Bax and
Bridge thoroughly deserved and even acute.  I tend to give the man his
likes and dislikes.  He is entitled to his wrong opinion.

It bothers me more that Pirie really doesn't argue anything.  He
proceeds by pronouncement and thus comes across as the guy during the
concert intermission repeating what he's heard other people say.  He
probably *has* heard this line over and over again and even pushed it
along.  Moreover, the organization of the book by year points to a severe
shortcoming in critical theory.  Pirie seems to believe that art exists
somewhere along the spectrum of advanced to conservative, and the very
notion of such a dichotomy indicates a rather touching faith in the
progress of music and, for that matter, of history.  History may progress,
but it progresses like a river rather than like a grand march toward
(but never reaching) perfection.  I'm sorry, but I suspect that Boulez
is not a greater composer than Bach, or Stevens, as good as he is, a
finer poet than Shakespeare.  Furthermore, in a hundred years it won't
matter aesthetically when anything was written.  It will matter to
historians and to music nerds like me.  Bach was behind the times,
Beethoven ahead of them.  Ultimately, we are thrown back on individual
works, devoid of historical context.  If we can enjoy a piece only once
we place it in a pigeonhole of cultural history, something has gone wrong
with either our ears or the piece itself.

Finally, for Pirie, "advanced" is often a synonym for "good,"
and "advanced" means essentially Schoenberg and his followers.  This
leads to the paradox that if major British composers had only adopted
dodecaphony, they would have been in the forefront behind.  For me, the
sole job of the artist is to create something beautiful and powerful.
Influence may issue as a by-product, but not striven for as a goal. That
sort of thing matters only to critics and musicologists who want their
job made easier or to those who for some reason never gave up playing
"king of the mountain" past the age of ten.  If artists are doubly
lucky, they will create the sublime or the beautiful in their own way.
Twentieth-century English music is a treasure of wonderfully individual
composers, strong-minded people whose music you can identify after a few
bars and who have turned tonality to powerful new purposes.  The fact
that they *don't* sound German, French, Russian, Lower Slobbovian, or
even (in the greatest of them) too much like each other seems to me
something considerable in their favor.  Furthermore, the fellow who says
something first isn't necessarily the one who says it best.  The one who
says it first and best is very rare.  But best is the goal.  As Shaw
once remarked, "But in art the highest success is to be the last of your
race, not the first." Haydn came before Mozart.  Nobody came after Mozart
to continue that style.

In short, Pirie's book has dated badly.  Someone should do an update.

Steve Schwartz

             ***********************************************
The CLASSICAL mailing list is powered by L-Soft's renowned LISTSERV(R)
list management software together with L-Soft's HDMail High Deliverability
Mailer for reliable, lightning fast mail delivery.  For more information,
go to:  http://www.lsoft.com/LISTSERV-powered.html

Top of Message | Previous Page | Permalink

Advanced Options


Options

Log In

Log In

Get Password

Get Password


Search Archives

Search Archives


Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Subscribe or Unsubscribe


Archives

May 2010
April 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
December 2006
November 2006
October 2006
September 2006
August 2006
July 2006
June 2006
May 2006
April 2006
March 2006
February 2006
January 2006
December 2005
November 2005
October 2005
September 2005
August 2005
July 2005
June 2005
May 2005
April 2005
March 2005
February 2005
January 2005
December 2004
November 2004
October 2004
September 2004
August 2004
July 2004
June 2004
May 2004
April 2004
March 2004
February 2004
January 2004
December 2003
November 2003
October 2003
September 2003
August 2003
July 2003
June 2003
May 2003
April 2003
March 2003
February 2003
January 2003
December 2002
November 2002
October 2002
September 2002
August 2002
July 2002
June 2002
May 2002
April 2002
March 2002
February 2002
January 2002
December 2001
November 2001
October 2001
September 2001
August 2001
July 2001
June 2001
May 2001
April 2001
March 2001
January 2001
December 2000
November 2000
October 2000
September 2000
August 2000
July 2000
June 2000
May 2000
April 2000
March 2000
February 2000
January 2000
December 1999
November 1999
October 1999
September 1999
August 1999
July 1999
June 1999
May 1999
April 1999
March 1999
February 1999
January 1999
July 1997

ATOM RSS1 RSS2



COMMUNITY.LSOFT.COM

Secured by F-Secure Anti-Virus CataList Email List Search Powered by the LISTSERV Email List Manager