KOLB: All in Good Time (1994). KERNIS: Sarabanda in Memoriam (1997 /
2003). HERSCH: Ashes of Memory (1999). CORIGLIANO: Midsummer Fanfare
(2004). HARBISON: Partita for Orchestra (2000).
Grant Park Orchestra/Carlos Kalmar
Cedille CDR 90000 090 (DDD) TT: 76:00
Summary for the Busy Executive: Middle America.
This CD brings together recent works by American composers, both better-
and less-known, from the conservative side of things. No boops and
squeaks, no rhythmic sludge, no plug-ins. Like most such collections,
some pieces come off better than others. Without a Genuine Masterpiece
Detector, I can't tell you which of these scores will live for the ages,
but that's never the point of music, or any art, for me. Probably the
least spiritual person you will ever meet, I want music to either stimulate
my mind or stir my hormones. Most of these works pass that test. In
a way, the program reminded me of those of the Sousa band in the early
part of the last century, which mixed serious classics, pops, and
lollipops. All I seemed to need was a bucket of fried chicken and
a tub of potato salad.
You can get the gist of Barbara Kolb's exciting curtain-raiser, All in
Good Time, through the title. This piece concentrates on rhythm. From
vigorous opening, somewhat reminiscent of Walter Piston, the work winds
down to its opposite, an evocation of near-stasis. From there it builds
back up. Kolb largely ignores harmony and melody -- indeed, the end is
mainly the repetition of one note -- but manages to pull off an exciting
work. My reservation comes down to the performance. Kalmar seems to
run out of dynamic room and therefore gives you a crude, hammering close,
rather than an ever-increasing build.
I've never cared for Corigliano's music, and the Midsummer Fanfare doesn't
win me to his side. In fact, it seems a compendium of his worst habits.
There's the "parting the mists of time" opening one encounters in many
others of his works, which so often sound as if somebody paid him by
minutes produced. In this case, the noodling around (because that's
what it is) lasts for slightly more than half the piece. When the work
finally gets around to chewing its thematic meat, Corigliano makes very
little of it, despite an arresting idea, as if he gums his food. Why
does he get commissions?
If the Corigliano comes down to trendy padding, Michael Hersch's Ashes
of Memory diffuses a lot of good ideas and thus dulls the effect. In
two movements, the work lays out its basic material in the first movement.
I'm sure that if I were to look at the score, I'd find a standard motific
development. But music is ultimately a matter of the ear, rather than
the eye. On the rhetorical level, the piece proceeds as "one thing and
then another." The far more successful second movement moves more
purposefully, but somewhere into the middle there's a restatement of
part of the first-movement exposition for no reason I can come up with.
Still, I prefer this to Corigliano.
I haven't yet made up my mind about the Kernis Sarabanda. For some
reason, I have trouble making my way through it. Yet I recognize its
superb craft and its gorgeous string sonorities. At times, I think I'm
listening to one of the great slow movements since Beethoven; at others,
I'm asleep. The fault may lie in the monochromatic performance. Kernis
dedicated the piece to the victims of 9/11 but had conceived it as part
of his string quartet years before. He arranged that movement for string
orchestra and hence the new title and dedication. Perhaps the piece not
laboring under the burden of expectations for a suitable In Memoriam of
something so far beyond the merely tragic exorcises the curse of pretention
or presumption. Like Bruckner, Kernis dares profundity. You can't
accuse him of sloughing off. I'm just not sure how close he comes.
At any rate, it's something I'll have to listen to several more times.
Right now, I like the Harbison Partita best, but in a way, this little
concerto for orchestra strikes me as the routine well-written piece
I hate to review. There's nothing wrong with it, but neither does it
contain any real risk, as I find in the Kernis. I may worry that Kernis's
risk might not pay off, but at least he took it. The Harbison more or
less updates neoclassicism with a slightly expressionist idiom. It
reminds me a bit of the Sessions Concertino for Chamber Orchestra, but
without that score's authority. Of its four movements, I like the second
-- a fleet rondo -- best. However, it also moves the most convincingly
of any work here. Harbison comes up with original, successful narrative
strategies, pretty much free of contemporary cliche. But everything
stays at a certain level, just below boiling. Nothing reaches out and
grabs you. The pleasures of the piece come at you from a certain remove.
The music doesn't really change you, as even great light music (the
Fledermaus overture, for example) does.
The Grant Park Orchestra under Kalmar presents these works in a highly
professional way and standards of playing have risen quite a bit in my
lifetime. Nevertheless, they don't reach the level of revelatory or
even vulgar enthusiasm. To me, the disc is a curiosity. How much
interest do you have in contemporary American music?
The CLASSICAL mailing list is powered by L-Soft's renowned LISTSERV(R)
list management software together with L-Soft's HDMail High Deliverability
Mailer for reliable, lightning fast mail delivery. For more information,
go to: http://www.lsoft.com/LISTSERV-powered.html