LISTSERV mailing list manager LISTSERV 16.0

Help for CLASSICAL Archives


CLASSICAL Archives

CLASSICAL Archives


CLASSICAL@COMMUNITY.LSOFT.COM


View:

Message:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Topic:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Author:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

Font:

Proportional Font

LISTSERV Archives

LISTSERV Archives

CLASSICAL Home

CLASSICAL Home

CLASSICAL  September 2005

CLASSICAL September 2005

Subject:

Re: Naxos Price Increase

From:

Karl Miller <[log in to unmask]>

Date:

Wed, 14 Sep 2005 08:28:07 -0500

Content-Type:

text/plain

Parts/Attachments:

Parts/Attachments

text/plain (69 lines)

Donald Satz wrote:

>So many times I have tried to impress on the store managers that my
>once yearly spending of many thousands of dollars per year is now down
>to about two-hundred bucks per annum.  I always get the same answer -
>"Those decisions are made at higher levels, but I will pass on your
>concerns".  As far as I can tell, everyone for Borders is taking a pass
>on my concerns.

>It all seems to be a catch-22 situation.  Stores aren't pleased with
>classical sales, so they downgrade the inventory.  That leads to customers
>going elsewhere which leads to more reductions in sales which leads to
>more customers finding other sources.  At this rate, the only thing left
>will be "The Browns", whoever they might be.

I am reminded of the backwards logic that invites symphony attendees
to let the orchestra know what pieces they would like to hear performed.
The real question is, what pieces would get the classical music lover
who does attend to buy a ticket.

Borders and just about every other vendor have the Wal Mart, or grocery
store mentality.  If it isn't off the shelf in a week, you shouldn't
stock it.

I cannot help but wonder if there is not room for a "classical store."
However, I would guess it would need to charge a premium price for
product.  On the other hand...a 24 bit 96,000 samples per second CD would
take a fair amount of time to download considering the bandwidth available
to most of us these days.

 From my perspective, it is another case of the bean counters counting
the wrong beans.

While I don't know if this is still true, years ago if you were a
multi outlet chain, you could get a break on the wholesale price.  It
was a system that favored the large outlets and strangled the mom and
pop shops.  I used to manage a locally owned classical record store and
it made it impossible for us to compete with the local discount chains.
We offered a wide range of selections and, I would like to think, informed
customer assistance.  We relied on our regulars.  I am know that sort
of thinking is not encouraged by most chains.

We maintained a list of our regulars, knew what interested them and
acquired product we thought would they would like.  To do that one had
to know classical music.

The lack of appreciation for classical music, from my perspective, has
a snowball effect. If you have marketing people who know marketing but
don't know their product or their audience, you aren't likely to address
your potential audience.

I am reminded of some years ago when I interviewed for a job with the
Dallas Symphony.  They wanted a head of marketing and education.  (Amazing
to think that one person would have both responsibilities) They hired
someone who had done marketing for a shopping center...and knew nothing
about classical music.  At least their artistic administrator is very
well informed about classical music...and a good friend.

I have been reading the book, "America on Record" by Andre Millard.  It
is interesting how, even in the early days of the phonograph, classical
music was marketed for its "snob appeal," instead of its own value.  I
believe, from a marketing standpoint, classical music has been suffering
ever since.

Writing this I just came up with an idea for an assignment for my Freshman
Seminar...an essay on "Why don't you and/or most people listen to and/or
like classical music?" It will be due next Friday.

Karl

Top of Message | Previous Page | Permalink

Advanced Options


Options

Log In

Log In

Get Password

Get Password


Search Archives

Search Archives


Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Subscribe or Unsubscribe


Archives

May 2010
April 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
December 2006
November 2006
October 2006
September 2006
August 2006
July 2006
June 2006
May 2006
April 2006
March 2006
February 2006
January 2006
December 2005
November 2005
October 2005
September 2005
August 2005
July 2005
June 2005
May 2005
April 2005
March 2005
February 2005
January 2005
December 2004
November 2004
October 2004
September 2004
August 2004
July 2004
June 2004
May 2004
April 2004
March 2004
February 2004
January 2004
December 2003
November 2003
October 2003
September 2003
August 2003
July 2003
June 2003
May 2003
April 2003
March 2003
February 2003
January 2003
December 2002
November 2002
October 2002
September 2002
August 2002
July 2002
June 2002
May 2002
April 2002
March 2002
February 2002
January 2002
December 2001
November 2001
October 2001
September 2001
August 2001
July 2001
June 2001
May 2001
April 2001
March 2001
January 2001
December 2000
November 2000
October 2000
September 2000
August 2000
July 2000
June 2000
May 2000
April 2000
March 2000
February 2000
January 2000
December 1999
November 1999
October 1999
September 1999
August 1999
July 1999
June 1999
May 1999
April 1999
March 1999
February 1999
January 1999
July 1997

ATOM RSS1 RSS2



COMMUNITY.LSOFT.COM

Secured by F-Secure Anti-Virus CataList Email List Search Powered by the LISTSERV Email List Manager