LISTSERV mailing list manager LISTSERV 16.0

Help for CLASSICAL Archives


CLASSICAL Archives

CLASSICAL Archives


CLASSICAL@COMMUNITY.LSOFT.COM


View:

Message:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Topic:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Author:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

Font:

Proportional Font

LISTSERV Archives

LISTSERV Archives

CLASSICAL Home

CLASSICAL Home

CLASSICAL  July 2005

CLASSICAL July 2005

Subject:

Schulhoff Symphonies

From:

Steve Schwartz <[log in to unmask]>

Date:

Mon, 4 Jul 2005 07:55:58 -0500

Content-Type:

text/plain

Parts/Attachments:

Parts/Attachments

text/plain (122 lines)

     Erwin Schulhoff

*  Symphony No. 5 (1938/39) 'A Romain Rolland'
*  Suite for Chamber Orchestra (1921)
*  Symphony No. 2 (1932)

Bavarian Radio Symphony Orchestra/James Conlon.
Capriccio 67 080 Total time: 72:46

Summary for the Busy Executive: More tragedy from the last 100 years.

Erwin Schulhoff, a Czech Jew executed by the Nazis, wrote music
like birds sing.  He began as a piano prodigy, getting into the Prague
conservatory on the recommendation of Dvorak himself.  Schulhoff's career
divides neatly into early, middle, and late.  Early on, he gets caught
up in various currents of the Twenties: the fascination with jazz,
neoclassicism, dada, and even some expressionism.  Georg Grosz became
an artistic hero, and Schulhoff had one of the largest private collections
of American jazz records in Europe.  His middle period is largely
neoclassic, while his final one connects both to the German neue
Saechlichkeit and to Stalin's Socialist Realism.

This CD brings together music from all phases of Schulhoff's career.
The earliest, the Suite for Chamber Orchestra, presents stylizations
of jazz popular dances, taking off from pieces like Stravinsky's Ragtime.
Four years later, Schulhoff recycled this music for his ballet Die
Mondsuechtige.  Given Schulhoff's knowledge of real jazz (not always the
case among the European composers who wrote jazzy pieces), I expected
an individual or at least unusual take, but the music doesn't differ
all that much from something like Martinu's Revue de cuisine or Le Jazz.
Still, it's a very witty piece.  The most unconventional movement in the
suite is "Step" (that is, the bare-bones music played for a tap dancer's
"break") -- all percussion.  However, if you've ever heard what a jazz
drummer does with his kit for a tap dancer, you might find it a bit tame.
For me the most affecting movement is the "Tango," sinuous, uneasy --
music you might hear in the Twilight Zone.  The scoring throughout is
very light.

Schulhoff worked for many years for radio, as conductor, composer,
and pianist.  As a composer, he viewed his main problem as effective
orchestration overcoming the crummy fidelity.  The usual gambits of
soulful, Brucknerian massed strings sounded muddy and "small" at the
same time.  The limits of radio moved him into neoclassicism -- clear,
vigorous counterpoint, light strings, and an emphasis on the reedier,
more penetrating winds, like oboes and high flutes.  The Symphony No.
2 -- to judge by the number of recordings, his most popular -- represents
the summit of this phase.  In four movements, the symphony begins with
a motor-allegro, filled with little Baroque licks.  The following andante
con moto, emphasizes the "con moto" rather than the andante.  It brings
to mind a pokey gavotte.  Again, the Baroque, objectified and updated,
shows up here and there in turns of phrase and harmony.  It's more a
matter of suggestion than imitation.  The scherzo reverts to Schulhoff's
early jazz manner, with solos for muted trumpet and sax, a greater
emphasis on percussion and syncopation, and strums from the ol' banjo.
Despite the previous movements, it doesn't seem out of place -- my
favorite of the four.  The finale lets its hair down in a Haydnesque
rondo.  Obviously, Schulhoff has little interest in the Grand Statement.
The symphony charms, rather than exhorts or lectures.  If you enjoy Haydn
symphonies, you might go for this one.

However, Schulhoff's musical mind had trouble settling on any one thing.
In the early Thirties, he committed himself to Communism and, like most
artists on the left, wondered about how his art could uplift the proletariat
and convert the bourgeoisie.  Many composers with Schulhoff's predicament
based their art on popular, vernacular sources, Copland and Weill among
them.  Schulhoff, of course, could easily and logically have reverted
to his jazz manner, but I believe his artistic restlessness denied him
that possibility.  His music became more outwardly serious and dour, in
a way that reminds me both of Weill's first symphony (also with a
high-minded social program) and of Shostakovich's "poster" symphonies.
His fourth symphony addressed the Loyalist cause of the Spanish Civil
War, and his fifth, the Munich Agreement which effectively left
Czechoslovakia to the Nazis.

Schulhoff's dedication of the fifth to French Nobel laureate Romain
Rolland may puzzle those unfamiliar with the writer's later career.
Rolland, beginning as a pacifist and greatly influenced by Gandhi in the
Twenties, became increasingly drawn to Socialism as he got older.  As
Europe fell into the twin nightmares of war and Fascism, Rolland must
have appealed to Schulhoff as a very timely figure.

Compared to the second, Schulhoff's fifth symphony is written with a
much broader and heavier brush.  He trades his previous subtle wit for
hortatory power.  Indeed, if you know only his work from the Twenties
and early Thirties, this symphony will surprise you.  It's a "war"
symphony, and no mistake.  Ideas are not only repeated, but hammered.
Schulhoff wants you to get the point.  The expressive meanings lie right
on the surface -- indeed, come right up to your face, like the classic
Che Guevara (Viva Che) print.

In four movements, the symphony opens with martial, mechanized figures,
dominated by brass and drums.  You can practically see German tanks
rolling across the Sudetenland.  There's variation here, but little sense
of transformation.  Schulhoff sticks with these figures and to mainly
one key (not even a key, so much as a pedal or anchor tone) throughout
the entire movement -- an anti-symphonic symphony in that regard.  The
second movement -- an adagio -- more or less surveys the battlefield
aftermath.  It's a gorgeous piece, avoiding the cliches of mourning
music, filled with powerful feeling that never steps over to the mawkish.
The scherzo (my favorite movement), curiously enough, blends the one in
Beethoven's Ninth, especially in the timpani figures, and Vaughan
Williams's Sixth.  Demons fly and howl through the air, getting more and
more distant as we reach the center.  They then wheel about and drive
back up to the movement's end.  The final measures will raise your hair
(assuming you have any).  The finale, the longest movement in the work
by far, gives us heroic struggle against the dark forces and, of course
-- Socialist Realist dictates being what they were -- ultimate triumph.
There are hints of what sounds to me like Russian folksong, but only
here and there.  For me, the movement goes on for far too long.  It could
have lost five minutes with little problem.  Despite some wonderful
passages, in general it comes over as too simplistic and too disjointed.
So a flawed symphony, but a powerful one.

Against the odds, I have several different performances of the Second
Symphony and the Suite.  Conlon beats them all.  It's easily the first
recommendation.  The others are good enough, but Conlon seems to bring
something more urgent and more individual to the table.  The orchestra
sounds like it's doing more than a very professional read-through.  Conlon
also does what he can to bring momentum and shape to the finale of the
Fifth.  It ain't easy.  The sound is good, though not spectacular.

Steve Schwartz

Top of Message | Previous Page | Permalink

Advanced Options


Options

Log In

Log In

Get Password

Get Password


Search Archives

Search Archives


Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Subscribe or Unsubscribe


Archives

May 2010
April 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
December 2006
November 2006
October 2006
September 2006
August 2006
July 2006
June 2006
May 2006
April 2006
March 2006
February 2006
January 2006
December 2005
November 2005
October 2005
September 2005
August 2005
July 2005
June 2005
May 2005
April 2005
March 2005
February 2005
January 2005
December 2004
November 2004
October 2004
September 2004
August 2004
July 2004
June 2004
May 2004
April 2004
March 2004
February 2004
January 2004
December 2003
November 2003
October 2003
September 2003
August 2003
July 2003
June 2003
May 2003
April 2003
March 2003
February 2003
January 2003
December 2002
November 2002
October 2002
September 2002
August 2002
July 2002
June 2002
May 2002
April 2002
March 2002
February 2002
January 2002
December 2001
November 2001
October 2001
September 2001
August 2001
July 2001
June 2001
May 2001
April 2001
March 2001
January 2001
December 2000
November 2000
October 2000
September 2000
August 2000
July 2000
June 2000
May 2000
April 2000
March 2000
February 2000
January 2000
December 1999
November 1999
October 1999
September 1999
August 1999
July 1999
June 1999
May 1999
April 1999
March 1999
February 1999
January 1999
July 1997

ATOM RSS1 RSS2



COMMUNITY.LSOFT.COM

Secured by F-Secure Anti-Virus CataList Email List Search Powered by the LISTSERV Email List Manager