LISTSERV mailing list manager LISTSERV 16.0

Help for CLASSICAL Archives


CLASSICAL Archives

CLASSICAL Archives


CLASSICAL@COMMUNITY.LSOFT.COM


View:

Message:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Topic:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Author:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

Font:

Proportional Font

LISTSERV Archives

LISTSERV Archives

CLASSICAL Home

CLASSICAL Home

CLASSICAL  January 2005

CLASSICAL January 2005

Subject:

Re: "Jeopardy" Players Spurn Classical Music

From:

Richard Tsuyuki <[log in to unmask]>

Date:

Mon, 10 Jan 2005 12:16:24 -0500

Content-Type:

text/plain

Parts/Attachments:

Parts/Attachments

text/plain (70 lines)

Sorry for chiming in late on a particular portion of this thread from
the end of last month, but it has been percolating in my head and something
finally occurred to me to say.  I was struck by this exchange between
two listmembers, Steve Schwartz responding to Mike Leghorn:

>>I confess, I don't know Richard Wilbur, Robert Hayden, Jane Kenyon, ...
>>
>>I'm not embarrassed about this....
>
>....of course you're not embarrassed by it.  But then neither is anyone
>else.  But there was a time, a few decades ago when people would have
>been embarrassed and would have done something to find out.
>
>>It's not every individual's duty to appreciate every work of genius
>>in every medium and field.
>
>I disagree.  Everything I don't know is my lack.

The point of these quotations is not to stir up ill feelings between the
posters.  But I was intrigued by the notion that one should be *embarrassed"
by ignorance, and that it is one's *duty* to appreciate genius.  Personally,
I would *like* to know everything, to have experienced everything.  But
I can't decide whether I *ought* to know everything.  Duty, to me, usually
implies a duty to someone or something external to oneself.  Unless,
perhaps, Mr. Schwartz meant, "It's your duty *to yourself*."

Part of the problem, of course, is that there are not enough hours in
the day, enough length to a life, to know everything.  Each of us has
to choose, "what do I want to hear/read/see/think about next?" How to
decide?  Is the generalist who is familiar with all periods of music,
art, literature in some way better off than the impassioned specialist
in Mahler who has never sought out a single note of Stockhausen or a
word of Merwin?  The easiest answer is, do what you want.  Sure.  But
how do we decide what we want?  Is it some innate, subconscious reaction
beyond our control, or do we have a way of intelligently discussing where
and why we focus our energies?

This leads to a pet philosophical question of mine: is there objective
value in art?  Does it make any sense to say that Beethoven is "better"
(in an encompassing sense) than Britney Spears, or that "Karamazov" is
a "better" book than "The Firm"?  Does Beethoven make me a better person,
happier, more able to contribute to society, than Britney?  I feel like
telling people to see "Casablanca" and avoid "Titanic", but why?  If
they enjoy "Titanic" immensely, is there anything unfortunate in that?
Or should I rather be embarrassed by a lack of attendance history at
monster-truck rallies?  Also, what about science and other fields of
knowledge?  Should one be embarrassed by lack of familiarity with quantum
chromodynamics?  With Hilbert space?  How to transplant a kidney?  Urdu?
Zoroastrianism?  The history of the World Series?  Is there something
that makes us feel that the arts contribute to humanity in a more generally
applicable way than other fields?

My own vague opinion (which I realize is, ultimately, completely
unsupportable), is currently something along these lines: humans have
evolved biologically as well as culturally to be capable of discerning and
enjoying great complexity.  Therefore, the enjoyment of complex things is
in some way true to or even extending the nature of what makes us human.
The broader the spectrum of complex art that we are exposed to, the more
comprehensive a picture of humanity we thereby obtain.  (It may even make
us better equipped to navigate the complexities and subtleties of modern
life, but that opening up a whole different discussion.)  Ergo, it is
"better" to cultivate the enjoyment of the broadest possible range of
complex art (even with a seemingly associated loss of ability to enjoy
things like pro-wrestling) than to spend time in narrower, simpler, more
primitive forms of entertainment.  Either that, or I'm just a snob, it's
all completely subjective and cannot be usefully discussed.  I don't know.

Seeking opinions,

Richard Tsuyuki

Top of Message | Previous Page | Permalink

Advanced Options


Options

Log In

Log In

Get Password

Get Password


Search Archives

Search Archives


Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Subscribe or Unsubscribe


Archives

May 2010
April 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
December 2006
November 2006
October 2006
September 2006
August 2006
July 2006
June 2006
May 2006
April 2006
March 2006
February 2006
January 2006
December 2005
November 2005
October 2005
September 2005
August 2005
July 2005
June 2005
May 2005
April 2005
March 2005
February 2005
January 2005
December 2004
November 2004
October 2004
September 2004
August 2004
July 2004
June 2004
May 2004
April 2004
March 2004
February 2004
January 2004
December 2003
November 2003
October 2003
September 2003
August 2003
July 2003
June 2003
May 2003
April 2003
March 2003
February 2003
January 2003
December 2002
November 2002
October 2002
September 2002
August 2002
July 2002
June 2002
May 2002
April 2002
March 2002
February 2002
January 2002
December 2001
November 2001
October 2001
September 2001
August 2001
July 2001
June 2001
May 2001
April 2001
March 2001
January 2001
December 2000
November 2000
October 2000
September 2000
August 2000
July 2000
June 2000
May 2000
April 2000
March 2000
February 2000
January 2000
December 1999
November 1999
October 1999
September 1999
August 1999
July 1999
June 1999
May 1999
April 1999
March 1999
February 1999
January 1999
July 1997

ATOM RSS1 RSS2



COMMUNITY.LSOFT.COM

Secured by F-Secure Anti-Virus CataList Email List Search Powered by the LISTSERV Email List Manager