LACTNET Archives

Lactation Information and Discussion

LACTNET@COMMUNITY.LSOFT.COM

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Maggie Payne <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Lactation Information and Discussion <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Fri, 3 Nov 2006 11:28:22 EST
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (63 lines)
While I appreciate the responses about the HIPAA question, all of the  
responses have come from persons that are in some way directly connected into  the 
HC system. Here in my part of WI it is common practice to have to hand carry  
HCP reports and related HCP reports back and forth. This is with a consent  
form to share information and a mom consent to see her! The clinic managers will  
not 'share' info back and forth especially if this info is leaving their  
practice group. This makes it increasing difficult to communicate and very  
frustrating to Moms. I have one poor Mom (permission to post in writing) whose  
baby has both palate and respiratory issues. She carries 2 3" binders with all  
of her baby's medical and alternative (ie chiropractor) reports to all  of the 
child's appointments. With HIPAA as it has been interpreted here  even the Mom 
had trouble obtaining her child's medical information. After  written 
requests to all HCPs that were ignored, this very inventive Mom stood at  each 
records dept. until all of the info. was released. Let's face it, not all  Moms will 
go this extra mile. If we, outside of the system, are not allowed to  
communicate with the HC system, what is the sense of this reporting? If the  HC 
system is able to ignore those that work in the community is it ethical for  us to 
worry about communicating with them? I am not doc bashing here. The docs  and 
midwives that commonly send Moms my way are just as frustrated at not  being 
about to get info to me.
 
How does this relate to the conversation?
 
If in the US we can't even agree how to interpret this law, how are the  HCPs 
and everyone else concerned supposed to interpret the new SOP. As I have  
read the Code of Ethics in preparation for the exam and now the new SOP it seems  
to me that the communication process is going to be more broken than it 
already  is.
 
The majority of this job is communication. Between Mom and me, Mom and Doc,  
Mom and Midwife, Mom and Chiropractor, etc. If we can't work as a team what's  
the point? I understand that BWC has been doing this reporting for years and  
that the HC system has accepted her as a practitioner within the HC system. 
But  a lot of us, WIC nurses, LLLLs, private LCs, CBEs etc. especially in the 
Midwest  are not considered within the HC system unless we are hospital based ( 
and those  are few and far between). I think as one of the no not so silent 
now 3000  that is the focus for the 'revised' SOP. Remember kindergarten, 
"Let's all work  together to get the job done" 
 
If you haven't guessed, I've had a very difficult couple of days trying to  
communicate with a HCP, who actually had the audacity to mention the new SOP 
for  IBCLCs, as a reason that I should not be contradicting his misinformation.
 
If we thought the rest of the community didn't know about this uproar  I 
guess we were wrong.
 
Peace,
Maggie Payne
LLLL Oshkosh WI, CBE

Dream Now so that your children learn to Dream for  Tomorrow!

             ***********************************************

To temporarily stop your subscription: set lactnet nomail
To start it again: set lactnet mail (or digest)
To unsubscribe: unsubscribe lactnet
All commands go to [log in to unmask]

The LACTNET email list is powered by LISTSERV (R).
There is only one LISTSERV. To learn more, visit:
http://www.lsoft.com/LISTSERV-powered.html

ATOM RSS1 RSS2