LACTNET Archives

Lactation Information and Discussion

LACTNET@COMMUNITY.LSOFT.COM

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Carla D'Anna <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Lactation Information and Discussion <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Sun, 8 Apr 2001 01:56:20 -0400
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (52 lines)
Perhaps you may have heard the argument, as I have, against mother/baby
co-sleeping because in King Soloman's court a woman was said to have killed
her child by laying on him.   Well, in the process of looking for something
else, I stumbled across this fascinating and detailed analysis of the case
where King Soloman ordered a sword be given to him, for the purpose of
settling an argument by cutting a living child in half.

First, this quote, an accusation by the first woman that the second woman
"lay upon" her child, causing his death.  This is the part I have heard used
against co-sleeping in the past.

"My Lord, this woman and I dwell in the same house, and I gave birth to a
child while with her in the house. On the third day after I gave birth, she
also gave birth. We live together; there is no outsider with us in the
house; only the two of us were there. The son of this woman died during the
night because she lay upon him. She arose during the night and took my son
from my side while I was asleep, and lay him in her bosom, and her dead son
she laid in my bosom"

But then, after young King Solomon gave the living child to the first woman,
stopping short of cutting him in half (it was all a ruse to expose the
second woman as the false mother) the author questions...

"But how could King Solomon have been sure the other (second) woman would
not also have mercy on the child? Wouldn't most people break down in such a
situation and relinquish their claims? What sort of person would want to be
responsible for the death of an innocent child, even if it were not her own?
"

The author then answers with this WONDERFUL explanation!

"Perhaps this was an aspect of the depth of King Solomon's insight - he knew
that no normal mother lies on her own child and crushes him in her sleep.
Babies always sleep with their mothers and fathers, yet this never happens,
for perhaps God implants within a human being an innate sensitivity that
prevents her from doing such a thing. A woman who lies on her child must be
lacking basic human feeling, and such a person would certainly have no mercy
on the child of another. According to the Abarbanel, perhaps such a woman
developed a blood lust and possessed a cruel desire to see another life
snuffed out. "

reference:
http://www.jlaw.com/Commentary/solomon.html - a web site about Jewish Law
specify the  article entitled "Jewish Law - Commentary/Opinion - The
Brilliant Wisdom of King Solomon"

             ***********************************************
The LACTNET mailing list is powered by L-Soft's renowned
LISTSERV(R) list management software together with L-Soft's LSMTP(TM)
mailer for lightning fast mail delivery. For more information, go to:
http://www.lsoft.com/LISTSERV-powered.html

ATOM RSS1 RSS2