Hmmm. I'm not sure I see the benefit. If a bottle is necessary, how is
this better than holding the bottle in a "nursing position"? It seems
like quite a contraption to wrestle around with when a baby is hungry.
But, worse, they are promoting its use to "include other family
members in the breast-feeding process." How, exactly? Do we really
want to promote a product that perpetuates the notion that feeding is
the only way to be close to a baby? It also says it, "supports
hands-free natural positioning and ergonomics for optimal
breast-feeding comfort." It's not breastfeeding. It might have an
artificial teat coming out of the approximate location of the nipple,
but it's not a breast. It's still a substitute.

Gina Gerboth
www.safepassagebirth.com

On Sun, Sep 14, 2008 at 3:43 PM, Sue Pace <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
> Has anyone seen this? Isn't it just great-natural bonding at it's best!
>
> http://dindlebee.com/
>
> Sue
> BFHI Coordinator Rotorua NZ IBCLE in waiting (results October)
>

             ***********************************************

Archives: http://community.lsoft.com/archives/LACTNET.html
To reach list owners: [log in to unmask]
Mail all list management commands to: [log in to unmask]
COMMANDS:
1. To temporarily stop your subscription write in the body of an email: set lactnet nomail
2. To start it again: set lactnet mail
3. To unsubscribe: unsubscribe lactnet
4. To get a comprehensive list of rules and directions: get lactnet welcome