Subject: | |
From: | |
Reply To: | |
Date: | Thu, 26 Oct 2000 07:11:41 -0700 |
Content-Type: | text/plain |
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
> Traditional advice suggests letting baby nurse first before toddler, but as
> I thought about it, the thoughts above gave me pause to re-think this issue.
>
I have always had a problem with this advice...after the mature milk
comes in, why not let the baby nurse whenever, or last for that matter?
It gives the baby the benefit of all the rich fatty hind milk.
For the record I am a LLL Leader and a Tandem Nursing mom of two. My
son was 3 when his sister was born, he went a *no solids* binge after
his sister was born for about 2 weeks, they both nursed very well at the
breast, together. She gained weight just fine, my milk came in quickly
and today they still nurse together.
He is 4.5 and she is 1.5 years old.
That midwife needs to get her personal bias' out of her medical advice.
LLL has a pretty extensive amount of information on Tandem Nursing in
the BAB, and so does the NMAA. And I believe that very issue is
covered, that the older nursling won't *deprive* the baby of anything,
in utero or out!
--
Robyn
****************
LLL of San Diego South Bay
***********************************************
The LACTNET mailing list is powered by L-Soft's renowned
LISTSERV(R) list management software together with L-Soft's LSMTP(TM)
mailer for lightning fast mail delivery. For more information, go to:
http://www.lsoft.com/LISTSERV-powered.html
|
|
|