HISTARCH Archives

HISTORICAL ARCHAEOLOGY

HISTARCH@COMMUNITY.LSOFT.COM

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Mary Ellin D'Agostino <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
HISTORICAL ARCHAEOLOGY <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Tue, 17 Oct 1995 14:12:37 -0700
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (26 lines)
As far as I know, unless you have a really high quality scanner, your
best bet is still to get a half-tone made of the original photo.
 
Mary Ellin D'Agostino
[log in to unmask]
 
On Tue, 17 Oct 1995, Larry Mckee wrote:
 
>      I am seeking some advise on how best to reproduce photos for photocopied
> interim/summary reports.  I've had some success with using color photocopies
> of black and white prints in a small number of "master" copies (since they
> cost about a buck a piece) and then using the color photocopy as the source
> for a regular photocopy in the rest of the 50 or so copies produced - this
> seems to work better than a straight xerox of the B&W's.
>      I know there are some elaborate scanning systems that are starting to be
> more affordable but the operation here is a long way off from buying such
> hardware.  Places like Kinko's and other self-serve copy centers are starting
> to have scanners available for customer use, but I'm pretty far behind in the
> vocabulary and the knowledge of where to start, and how far to go with it.
>      Can anyone provide a quick tutorial on their successes with this or
> recommend a published source on the clearest and cheapest way to reproduce
> photos for photocopied reports?
>                          Thanks
>                              Larry McKee
>

ATOM RSS1 RSS2