HISTARCH Archives

HISTORICAL ARCHAEOLOGY

HISTARCH@COMMUNITY.LSOFT.COM

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Brian Siegel <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
HISTORICAL ARCHAEOLOGY <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Mon, 21 Apr 1997 09:24:18 -0400
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
Re: (12 lines)
I understand Larry and Diane's point about pigs being admirable
meat-making machines.  They're mean; they eat anything that stands
still; and they reproduce like rabbits.  But I'd thought this was all
known to medieval Europe.
 
Was this somehow not true of the British too?  It may well be, because
part of the notoriety attached to America's Scotch-Irish immigrants was
their fondness for free-range pigs.  Again, why the limited evidence for
pork in the 17th and early 18th century Chesapeake?
 
Brian Siegel

ATOM RSS1 RSS2