HISTARCH Archives

HISTORICAL ARCHAEOLOGY

HISTARCH@COMMUNITY.LSOFT.COM

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Reply To:
HISTORICAL ARCHAEOLOGY <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Thu, 22 Mar 2012 13:35:50 -0400
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (129 lines)
 
 
 
 
From: NASA (National  Association of State Archaeologists) 
[mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf  Of Doershuk, John F
Sent: Thursday, March 22, 2012 12:19  PM
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: [NASA] Report on Spike  TV's "American Diggers"

Dear  Colleagues: 
I watched the premiere  episode of Spike TV's "American Diggers" broadcast 
yesterday evening. Happily,  it was just a 30-minute episode, which they 
immediately repeated. I scanned  ahead a bit on the channel guide and it 
appears Spike typically reruns shows  heavily, so the same episode aired at 
midnight and will run again every day  this week. This episode was shot in Alaska, 
next week’s program was shot in  Detroit. As is the case with most TV these 
days it was  chock full of ads  (more on these, below), so I doubt there 
was more than 18 minutes or so of  content, especially since they repeat prior 
bits after an advertising block to  remind the viewer of the storyline. The 
intro segment to the show describes  the intent of the series, and it is 
unabashedly as the Internet advertising  indicated: find historical objects, 
ignore context, sell for profit.  Very entrepreneurial and a premise that is 
hard to argue with, after all,  isn't a basic principle of America the right 
for all to exploit everything  they can to earn a living? 
The cast of "American  Diggers"  includes a crew of four headed by Ric 
Savage, who was center  stage throughout, with the other three really filling 
minor roles. Savage is  an ebullient larger-than-life character but no fool. 
Interestingly, one of his  crew, identified only as "Bob," was labeled as a “
battlefield historian” while  the other, younger crew members were simply 
muscle. Otherwise, they were all  self-styled “diggers” with "let's dig!" 
being their byline. In this first  episode they limited themselves to using 
metal detectors and hand tools (they  were exploiting Alaska gold rush-era 
camps) but the intro segment shows that  backhoes, jackhammers, and even high 
explosives will be used in future  episodes. Savage and his crew joke around 
some, but the buffoonery that  characterized Natl Geo's "Diggers" was 
missing. Savage is portrayed as a man  in serious pursuit of his passion – i.e., 
digging up and selling historical  objects. He claims his passion is finding 
history and holding it in his hands,  but as with "Diggers," "American 
Diggers" falls well short of communicating  any sort of "discovery rush." 
Unfortunately, the "rush" provided by the show  was most evident when Savage sells 
the items recovered at the antique mart and  "the past" gets translated into 
cash. True to his word, Savage shared the take  with the property owner 
(70/30 split with the landowner getting the smaller  amount)—and the producer 
made sure the camera caught the enthusiasm blossoming  in the face of the 
landowner when Savage handed over the money. You could  literally see the wheels 
turning—that's a landowner who will never think of  cultural resources on 
their property as something to preserve. So even though  Savage and the 
"American Diggers" crew came and went relatively quickly, that  landowner (and 
everyone he talks with in the area) will be thinking $$ for  objects. 
There was zero mention of  archaeology or science, and no effort made at 
all trying to legitimate this  activity as anything remotely educational or 
additive to general knowledge.  The term "artifacts" was used as Savage 
characterizes his firm as an "artifact  recovery company." The recent New York 
Times article published March 20 on the  show indicates that Rita Savage, Ric's 
wife, researches "the historical record  of an area, compar[ing] period 
maps with contemporary maps" but this activity  (and Rita) did not make it into 
the program. Savage did describe the gold  rush-era landscape they were 
interested in from an informed perspective and  had a good idea about where to 
target his metal detecting. Given the lack of  concern the show has for 
documenting findings, it is in my opinion just as  well the archival research 
efforts were not portrayed and I’m glad there was  no attempt made cast the 
show as science of any sort. 
As I noted for "Diggers,"  the most damaging thing about "American Diggers" 
 is that no effort is  made to document where anything came from and there 
is no discussion of  associations—each discovered item was handled 
piece-meal. "The past" and  "history" were repeatedly invoked as cool and 
interesting, but ultimately,  simply a source of cash. And cash, in the end, is what 
this show is about,  just as with “Diggers.” With “American Diggers,” Savage 
is about finding  thousands of dollars’ worth of objects whereas the Natl 
Geo guys were  happy with recovering just hundreds of dollars. Spike TV is, 
of course,  involved because of advertising revenue. Here's the "American 
Diggers"  advertiser list: Subway, DQ, Chilis, Red Robin, Red Lobster, Arbys, 
Taco Bell,  Best Western, GEICO, Esurance, Quaker State, Reeses, Cheetos, FOX 
Channel,  other Spike TV shows, Nintendo, several current movies, and 
Internet Explorer  9. Quite a mix (and as noted, volume), but notably no cell 
phone companies,  upscale cars, or premium beer (in fact, contrary to my 
expectations, no beer  ads at all which amply demonstrates the target audience is 
not  archaeologists), so rather different that the Natl Geo “Diggers” 
advertising  clientele.  
Here's the most ironic—and  telling—observation I can offer: Savage 
recognizes that linking an object to  its broader historical context increases 
collector interest and the monetary  value of items his crew recovers. For 
example, he knows a Civil War sword is  more valuable than a sword with no 
period or conflict association and that a  Confederate Civil War sword has even 
more value, and particular battlefield or  officer association would really 
up the ante. However, he does not participate  in recording any contextual 
detail for the finds he makes. Thus, he uses—and  profits from—the accrued 
historical knowledge base that has built up through  time about these objects 
but doesn't in turn contribute. Rather, he tears  individual items out of 
context and then injects them into a collector market  where he excitedly 
discusses probable age, maker's marks, and condition with  the buyer but there 
is no effort made to communicate the locational details of  the discovery or 
associations between items or the landscape from which they  came. So just 
as the value of a newly purchased car diminishes as soon as one  drives off 
the lot, the items Savage recovers diminish in potential cash value  (and 
knowledge value) as soon as he sells and the scant contextual details are  
eroded or lost. Exclamations of “this is really rare!” fail to trigger in  
Savage’s mind thoughts of “we should learn all we can about this context as we  
destroy it recovering this item.” The show certainly doesn’t attempt to 
prompt  such thinking by its viewers. Each subsequent buyer of these items 
knows less  and less as there are no accompanying data communicated about where 
and with  what the item was found. So the big problem with the “American 
Diggers”  approach is that artifacts rapidly become mere collectibles, not 
necessarily  without cash value, but in fact "worth" far less than they might 
be if their  full contextual story was recorded and transmitted/preserved 
from  seller to buyer.    
Dick (and others receiving  this report), if you are so inclined, please 
feel free to use whatever portion  of this information you like to continue 
conversations—now informed rather  than speculative—with Spike TV (and send 
to Fred Limp at SAA and others if you  like); I'll be sharing this report on 
the ACRA list.  
John  Doershuk 
State Archaeologist  (Iowa) 



ACRA-L is a  public listserv supported by the American Cultural Resources 
Association  (ACRA), a non-profit trade association, for the use of the 
cultural resource  management community.   You do not need to belong to ACRA to  
subscribe to this list.  As a result, opinions expressed on the list do  not 
necessarily represent the views of ACRA or of its members.  For more  
information on the list and to unsubscribe use the links  below.
_______________________________________________
acra-l mailing  list
[log in to unmask]
http://lists.nonprofit.net/mailman/listinfo/acra-l
This  email sent to: [log in to unmask]

ATOM RSS1 RSS2