HISTARCH Archives

HISTORICAL ARCHAEOLOGY

HISTARCH@COMMUNITY.LSOFT.COM

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Reply To:
HISTORICAL ARCHAEOLOGY <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Thu, 23 Jan 1997 09:51:05 EST
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (29 lines)
Iain Stuart wrote:
>
> Mail*Link(r) SMTP               Ethnicity-a reply
>
> This has been a very interesting thread.
>
> One difficulty is that we are so familar with the material culture we excavate
> that it is difficult to remember that it may not have the meanings we assume
> it does. This is particularlly true for 19th and 20th century sites.
 
 
 
>
> As an antidote I suggest some living archaeology in our own context to look at
> the diversity of meanings ascribed to material culture.
>
> I have no really good ideas for a methdology to overcome this in the field
> however the use of the historical record as a way of building contexts (a form
> of Thick Description) seems to be one way to go.
>
> Rather than cite Binford and Bordes I think Henry Glassie's approach to
> material culture is worth revisiting. "Folk housing in Middle Virginia" is a
> very interesting book for both what it says about the houses and the
> analytical approach.
>
> A former out of touch bureaucrat
> University of Sydney
>

ATOM RSS1 RSS2