HISTARCH Archives

HISTORICAL ARCHAEOLOGY

HISTARCH@COMMUNITY.LSOFT.COM

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Patrick Tucker <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
HISTORICAL ARCHAEOLOGY <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Mon, 1 Oct 2007 22:03:02 -0400
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (116 lines)
To answer James Murphy's questions about the metrics of the gray-colored
clay specimen depicted in the digital images:

1. The maximum diameter of the bowl at the mouth (above the rib)is 22mm.
2. The interior diameter of the bowl (at the mouth)is 17mm.
3. The maximum diameter of the stub-stem is 10.2mm.
4. Bore diameter is 0.25 in.(6.5mm).
5. Height of bowl is 34mm.
6. Stub-stem length is 19mm.
6. Maximum length of pipe (max bowl diameter and stem length)is 41mm.

Pat Tucker

-----Original Message-----
From: HISTORICAL ARCHAEOLOGY [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of JAMES
MURPHY
Sent: Monday, October 01, 2007 9:09 AM
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Re: Clay Pipe Identification

Pat,

These small, relatively plain reed stem pipes are difficult to distinguish
and as you suggest were made at many different potteries.  The chief
characteristics of yours are the small size, distinct rib at the end of the
stem, and less prominent but distinct rib at the edge of the bowl.  

In Ohio, this general type occurs at the factories in Point Pleasant,
Mogadore, and Akron.  Those from Mogadore and Akron have the rib at least a
slight distance below the edge of the bowl, and I feel confident that yours
was not made at either place.

In form yours looks closest to one from the Kirkpatrick-Peterson factory at
Point Pleasant, which Thomas and Burnett called PL-4 and I called Point
Pleasant Ringed Elbow var. A.  However, your dimensions are a little
smaller.  Var. A has bowl diameter 25-26 mm, maximum length 39-40 mm;
maximum height 37-40 cm. Stem diameter is 12-14 mm.  

Is the stem on your specimen complete enough to measure maximum diameter and
bore diameter?  When you say "diameter of the bowl mouth," do you mean
maximum diameter or diameter of the interior of the bowl?  And I take your
"length of bowl" to be the maximum vertical "length," which is usually
termed "height."  Is the maximum length of the pipe a total of your bowl
diameter and stem length: 22 plus 18 = 40 mm?

The nearby Tom Peterson pottery made lots of plain styles but most lack a
ring around the bowl lip.  There is a smaller form very similar but seems to
have a proportionately longer stem. Most are characterized by a distinctive
shape to the interior base of the bowl, which has a step or platform
surrounding a slightly deeper indentation.  It would be very interesting if
your pipe shows this feature, as that would just about clinch the identity.

Some of the brown coloration may be due to oxidation of adjacent metal but
the red-brown coloration is also typical of many of these stoneware pipes,
which vary from gray to various shades of brown.    

Jim Murpy
[log in to unmask]


----- Original Message -----
From: Patrick Tucker <[log in to unmask]>
Date: Saturday, September 29, 2007 9:31 pm
Subject: Clay Pipe Identification

> Can anyone identify this clay pipe as to type or possibly 
> manufacturer? It
> is plain (no decoration) and gray in color with a short stem. It 
> has a mould
> seam in the front and back running the length of the pipe. 
> Diameter of the
> bowl mouth is 22mm. Length of the bowl is 35mm. Length of stem is 
> only 18mm.
> There is some discoloration on the bowl due to oxidation of metal 
> (probablyiron). The object comes from an archaeological site known 
> as Port of
> Miami/Orleans (33Wo50) on the Maumee River in northwest Ohio, and 
> dates ca.
> 1810-1850. I suspect the pipe was locally manufactured, like redware
> pottery, and post-dates CE 1850 since it comes from the surface of 
> the site.
> White clay (kaolin) pipes (bowls and unmarked stems) were found within
> specific features and the plow zone. The site contains a residential
> structure (cabin remodeled into or succeeded by a frame house with 
> a brick
> foundation). Digital images of the pipe can be found at the links 
> below.
> 
> 
>
http://i145.photobucket.com/albums/r230/Pat_Tucker/33Wo50PipeGrayClayShortSt
> emNo425Lef.jpg
> 
> 
> 
>
http://i145.photobucket.com/albums/r230/Pat_Tucker/33Wo50PipeGrayClayShortSt
> emNo425Rig.jpg
> 
> 
> 
>
http://i145.photobucket.com/albums/r230/Pat_Tucker/33Wo50PipeGrayClayShortSt
> emNo425Bot.jpg
> 
> 
> 
> Pat Tucker
> 
> French Canadian Heritage Society of Michigan
> 
> Detroit
> 
> 
> 

ATOM RSS1 RSS2