HISTARCH Archives

HISTORICAL ARCHAEOLOGY

HISTARCH@COMMUNITY.LSOFT.COM

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Margo Schwadron <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
HISTORICAL ARCHAEOLOGY <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Wed, 18 Oct 1995 16:49:51 -0400
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (23 lines)
=09
I was part of the 1991 Stonybrook University Terry-Mulford Field Project =
in Orient Point, Long Island, New York. We labeled thousands of =
artifacts using laser printed catalog numbers printed on acid-free paper =
and laquer. It was by far the most efficient labeling technique I have =
ever seen. For each artifact, we cut out a small square with a =
pre-printed catalog number on it, with an exacto-knife,  placed it on =
the artifact, and then applied a coat of laquer over it.=20
 
As far as the stability of this technique is concerned, I have not heard =
anything. At the National Park Service, there are federally approved =
standards to follow for the handeling, labeling and curation of =
artifacts. As far as I know, the only approved method for artifact =
labeling is the old pen, ink and laquer (approved brands, of course). =
Perhaps someone should conduct a study for the stability of the =
pre-printed labels or paper and laquer methods. Does anyone know about =
any?
 
Margo Schwadron
NPS-Southeast Archeological Center
 
[log in to unmask]

ATOM RSS1 RSS2