HISTARCH Archives

HISTORICAL ARCHAEOLOGY

HISTARCH@COMMUNITY.LSOFT.COM

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Jim Adams <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
HISTORICAL ARCHAEOLOGY <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Thu, 2 Jun 1994 17:25:08 -1000
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (18 lines)
In a similar fashion I have heard these arguments here in Hawaii.  As an
archaeology graduate student - and a haole (which means foreigner in
Hawaiian and generally refers to "white"), I was told by a Hawaiian
history and language professor that because I was not Hawaiian, I had no
business studying Hawaiian history.  It was not possible for me to
understand their history.  She advocated a law that would prevent  any of
us from studying Hawaiian history, doing Hawaiian archaeology or studying
anthropology.
 
I would advocate that what I know about my original Eastern US culture
and history is not because I was born white, and thus must have had it in
my blood, but instead what I learned in school, etc.  Granted that much
of it was probably biased, but again, that was something taught, not
automatic because of my birth.
 
Jim Adams
University of Hawaii

ATOM RSS1 RSS2