Subject: | |
From: | |
Reply To: | |
Date: | Fri, 3 Jun 1994 13:11:17 -0700 |
Content-Type: | text/plain |
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
What do you mean by "white" anyway? There is no monolithic "white"
culture/ethnicity. Or do you mean race? Just as "non-whites", people with
light skin and of general European ancestry come from a wide variety of
backgrounds. As a person of Irish-Italian ancestry, isn't my excavation
of a "British" site just as much of a trap? Yes, people of a dominant
cultural group need to be careful of their biases, but so does everyone
else. And skin color does not necessarily mean one grew up as a member
of the dominant group--there are plenty of "white" ethnic "ghettos".
[Please note that this commentary does not mean that I think I am a
member of some downtrodden minority.]
On Fri, 3 Jun 1994, JohnB wrote:
> I think that as archaeologists we all have to be concerned about
> our own views mixing in with our research. The trap of white
> archaeologists excavating African-American sites (or any other non-white
> group for that matter), is that the information is filtered through our
> own views, ideas, and prejudices. I think perhpas that one way to
> diffuse that might be to diversify your knowledge, and to seek opinions
> and ideas outside of yourself. Use all the resources available to you,
> don't simply assume you understand the significance of an artifact.
> While an artifact may have great meaning to you, it might have an even
> deeper meaning to someone of that group. By realizing you might have a
> bias (unintentional or not), you can help to dampen it somewhat
> John Buckler
> [log in to unmask]
>
|
|
|