HISTARCH Archives

HISTORICAL ARCHAEOLOGY

HISTARCH@COMMUNITY.LSOFT.COM
Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
Re: prohibition-era still sites
From:
Elliot Richmond <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
HISTORICAL ARCHAEOLOGY <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Wed, 20 Mar 1996 11:13:36 -0600
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (14 lines) 
On Wed, 20 Mar 1996, David Rotenstein wrote:
 
> Kate,
>
> Just because you found a still site doesn't mean it's "Prohibition Era." =
> Do the associated artifacts (and the still itself) date from the =
> Volstead Act period (1919-1933)? I've read a lot of Phase I reports =
> where stills have been encountered and automatically ascribed to the =
> Prohibition Period just because they've been busted up by "Revenuers."
>
 
OK, let's get this right.  It's revenooers, not that French looking
word.  With the emphasis on noo.

ATOM RSS1 RSS2