HISTARCH Archives

HISTORICAL ARCHAEOLOGY

HISTARCH@COMMUNITY.LSOFT.COM

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
James Brothers <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
HISTORICAL ARCHAEOLOGY <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Mon, 13 Mar 2006 17:34:18 -0500
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (32 lines)
On at least one occasion, when looting was a real issue, we found a  
deputy sheriff does wonders in terms of deterring "collectors". If  
the site is reasonably important and not going to be open for too  
long, police may be part of your answer.

On Mar 13, 2006, at 0:56, Jane Lee wrote:

> I totally appreciate your concern for context, Ron. That is a  
> serious concern for me as well, and that concern is really what  
> prompted my post. I wouldn't rely on heavy equipment if I didn't  
> feel that it was absolutely necessary in this situation. However,  
> Mike has hit the nail right on the head. Although I don't feel that  
> it's a good idea to go into too many site specific details, I'll  
> suffice it to say we are working within some real time, money, and  
> crew constraints. Not to mentions that this area is notorious for  
> being home to some pretty brazen collectors with Bobcats. So, we  
> are looking to be able to record and collect as much detailed  
> information as possible (again, I agree, context IS key) as  
> effectively, efficiently, and safely as possible. Therefore, I'm  
> hoping that there are a few of you HISTARCHer's that might be able  
> to offer some advice, insight, or methodology that could aid in  
> data collection.
>
> Sincerely,
> Jane
>
>
> ----- Original Message ----- From: <[log in to unmask]>
> To: <[log in to unmask]>
> Sent: Sunday, March 12, 2006 10:38 PM
> Subject: Re: Urban archaeology methods question

ATOM RSS1 RSS2