HISTARCH Archives

HISTORICAL ARCHAEOLOGY

HISTARCH@COMMUNITY.LSOFT.COM

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Rich Lundin <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
HISTORICAL ARCHAEOLOGY <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Fri, 20 Jul 2007 07:15:20 -0700
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (30 lines)
Geoff:

Amen to that!  As a double major (anthro & geo) for my undergraduate work in 
the 60's at Beloit, I was appalled at the lack of knowledge of 
geology-especially geochemistry and geophysics-that most archaeologists 
typically have.  It is really important now that we have the emerging 
subfields of archaeogeophysics and archaeochemistry.

Rich Lundin
----- Original Message ----- 
From: "geoff carver" <[log in to unmask]>
To: <[log in to unmask]>
Sent: Thursday, July 19, 2007 12:53 AM
Subject: Re: An academic-type question


> calgary & SFU (simon frazier) up in canada also have independent 
> archaeology dep'ts; at calgary we had to take introductory courses in 
> geology & anthropology & linguistix, and they encouraged us to take 
> relevant courses from history, computer science, statistics, fine arts 
> (back when they had a good ceramics program), etc.
> ----- Original Message ----- 
>
> Subject: Re: An academic-type question
>
>
>> there is only one
>> Department of Archaeology in the United States.
> 

ATOM RSS1 RSS2