CLASSICAL Archives

Moderated Classical Music List

CLASSICAL@COMMUNITY.LSOFT.COM
Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
Re: Brahms & Bruckner
From:
James Zehm <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Wed, 14 Jun 2006 07:28:50 +0200
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (12 lines) 
Deryk Barker [[log in to unmask]] wrote:

>Given this information, I cannot see how one can continue to claim that
>Mahler's piano reduction should be considered a better representation
>of the original Third than Nowak's edition of the original 1873 version
>of the Third.

Because Nowak added brass?

James Zehm
[log in to unmask]

ATOM RSS1 RSS2